1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Least square reverse time migration (LSRTM) provides better imaging result than conventional migration methods but the computational cost of common shot LSRTM is high. The phase encoding technique is usually adopted to enhance the efficiency. In this paper, the orthogonal cosine basis is used as encoding function which is an amplitude encoding function. And it is more convenient to implement and more efficient than phase encoding functions in time domain LSRTM. The reference distance plays an important role in suppressing crosstalk noise. We develop two schemes called fixed-distance scheme and shifting-distance scheme during iterations. In the first scheme, the reference distance is fixed during iterations. In the second scheme, the reference distance is decreasing during iterations to obtain higher efficiency gain. And since the crosstalk noise is moving as the reference distance changes, the stack of gradients during iterations can suppress the crosstalk noise. Numerical examples demonstrate the feasibility of this method.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141161
2014-06-16
2023-03-27

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141161
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. GodwinJ. and SavaP.
    [2010] Blended source imaging by amplitude encoding. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3125–3129.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. RomeroL.A., GhigliaD.C., OberC.C. and MortonS.A.
    [2000] Phase encoding of shot records in prestack migration. Geophysics65, 426–436.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai. W. P.Fowler and G. T.Schuster
    [2012] Multisource least-squares reverse time migration. Geophysical Prospecting60, 681–695.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dai. W. and G. T.Schuster
    . [2013] Plane-wave least squares reverse-time migration. Geophyscis78, S165–S177.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Soubaras. R.
    [2006] Modulated-shot migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2430–2434.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. HuJ.T., WangX.W. and WangH.Z.
    [2011] Frequency grouping coding scheme for blended source imaging. CPS/SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, ID:79.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ZhangY., SunJ., NotforsC., GrayS.H., ChernisL. and YoungJ.
    [2005] Delayed-shot 3D depth migration. Geophysics70, E21–E28.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ZhangY., SunJ. and GrayS.
    [2007] Reverse time migration: amplitude and implementation issues. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts2145–2149.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Plessix, R. E. and W. A.Mulder
    . [2004] Frequency-domain finite-difference amplitude-preserving migration. Geophysical Journal International157, 975–987.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141161
Loading
Efficient Amplitude Encoded Least Square RTM Using Cosine Basis
Conference Proceedings 2014, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141161
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141161
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141161
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error