1887

Abstract

Summary

Seafloor time-lapse gravity and subsidence data provide a measurement of the density distribution within the reservoir. This independent source of information complements the inputs from seismic and electromagnetic techniques to effectively constrain the reservoir models. 4D gravity is especially fitted for monitoring contacts between fluids with relatively large density contrast, like gas-water, gas-oil, or CO2-water in injection sites.

The precision of seafloor gravity measurements has dramatically improved in the last two decades to the level of 2 μGal. This is orders of magnitude better than in other gravimetric techniques, with the additional advantage of measurements being taken closer to the source. This has established gravity as a mature and cost-efficient monitoring technique. In the example of localizing a raising gas-water contact, the attainable precision translates into sub-meter sensitivity in the height of the contact.

The value of gravity and subsidence data has become evident in many gas production and sequestration fields in the last decade. This paper reviews a few of those cases, and presents the recent advances in the technology. In addition, the range of applicability in terms of reservoir properties and the lateral resolution that can be attained are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412551
2015-06-01
2020-02-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alnes, H., Stenvold, T. and Eiken, O.
    [2010] Experiences on Seafloor Gravimetric and Subsidence Monitoring Above Producing Reservoirs. 72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, L010.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alnes, H., Eiken, O. and Stenvold, T.
    [2008] Monitoring gas production and CO2 injection at the Sleipner field using time-lapse gravimetry. Geophysics, 73, 155–161.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eiken, O., Stenvold, T., Zumberge, M., Alnes, H., Sasagawa, G.
    [2008] Gravimetric monitoring of gas production from the Troll field. Geophysics, 73, 149–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fageraas, B., Lien, M. and Agersborg, R.
    [2013] Using gravity to enhance recovery. GeoExpro, 10, 62–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lien, M., Mannseth, T. and Agersborg, R.
    , Assimilation of Time-lapse CSEM Data for Fluid Flow Monitoring [2014] 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, WS9–C07.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sasagawa, G. S., Wayne, C., Eiken, O., Nooner, S., Stenvold and Zumberge, M. A.
    [2003] A new seafloor gravimeter. Geophysics, 68, 544–553.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Stenvold, T., Eiken, O. and LandrØ, M.
    [2008] Gravimetric monitoring of gas-reservoir water influx – A combined flow- and gravity-modelling approach. Geophysics, 73, 123–131.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vevatne, J. N., Alnes, H., Eiken, O., Stenvold, T., Vassenden, F.
    [2012] Use of Field-wide Seafloor Time-lapse Gravity in History Matching the Mikkel Gas Condensate Field. 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, F040.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412551
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412551
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error