1887

Abstract

Summary

Post-stack time-lapse seismic data is always used to interpret the change of thick reservoir. The difference between baseline seismic data and monitoring seismic data cannot be identified directly by analyzing the changes of travelling time in thin reservoir because the change is too small. Differential Waveform can effectively reflect the change of P-wave velocity of thin reservoir and the reservoir change caused by hydrocarbon production or gas/fluid injection. The original P-wave velocity of the reservoir and the surrounding rock does not affect the differential waveform of time-lapse seismic data. The differential waveform is determined by the change of P-wave velocity of the reservoir. When P-wave velocity of the thin reservoir increased during oilfield development, the differential waveform is Positive Waveform(wave trough above wave peak). When P-wave velocity of the thin reservoir decreases, the differential waveform is Negative Waveform(wave peak above wave trough). The study area is located in the deep water of West Africa. Water injection has been used to improve the recovery efficiency. Baseline seismic survey was acquired in 1998 and monitoring seismic survey was acquired in 2011. The change of reservoir caused by oilfield development is identified by analyzing differential waveform of time-lapse seismic data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141256
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Johnston, D. H., McKenny, R. S., Verbeek, J. and Almond, J.
    [1998] Time-lapse seismic analysis of Fulmar Field. The Leading Edge, 17(10), 1420–1428.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, Z., Wang, D.W., Zhao, W., Xia, Q.L. and Li, L.X.
    [2007]Causes and types of the differential waveform of time-lapse seismic data of thin layer. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 42(3), 290–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Raef, A. E., Miller, R. D., Byrnes, A. P. and Harrison, W. E.
    [2004] 4D seismic monitoring of the miscible CO 2 flood of Hall-Gurney Field, Kansas, US. The Leading Edge, 23(11), 1171–1176.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141256
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141256
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error