1887

Abstract

Summary

Static models have been used for many decades in the oil industry and with the right amount of data and expertise they can be used to great effect, key tools in helping geoscientists understand and maximise the efficiency of reservoirs. However what happens when that data available is incomplete or missing? How can viable static models be generated for older wells, where relevant data may only be recorded in hand drawn maps and paper logs? Is it possible to construct accurate and reliable 3D models that can be used successfully?

This article aims to show that these challenges can be overcome and a good model can be built if there is a clear principle objective in mind for what that model needs to achieve, alongside a good sound understanding of geology. In order to generate the 3D model for Zeme Field, information from, outcrops, old paper logs, well reports, neighbouring fields, production data, pressure data, core data as well as some articles was all taken into account. In addition to this, having a clear understanding of the procedure in terms of model construction and using relevant software is of key importance to avoid inaccurate results in the process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412669
2015-06-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BelayouniH., Di StasoA., GuerreraF., Martín-MartínM., MiclăusC., & TramontanaM.
    [2009] Stratigraphic and geochemical study of the organic-rich black shales in the Tarcău Nappe of the Moldavidian Domain (Carpathian Chain, Romania). Int. J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch)98, 157–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GuerreraF., Martín-MartínM., Martín-PérezJ., Martín-RojasI., MiclăuC., & SerranoF.
    [2012] Tectonic control on the sedimentary record of the central Moldavidian Basin (Eastern Carpathians, Romania. Geologica Carpathica63(6), 463–479.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MelinteM.C.
    [2005] Oligocene palaeoenvironmental changes in the Romanian Carpathians, revealed by calcareous nannofossils. Stud Geol Pol, 124, 341–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MiclăuşC., LoiaconoF., PuglisiD. & Baciu DorinS.
    [2009] Eocene-Oligocene sedimentation in the external areas of the Moldavide Basin (Marginal Folds Nappe, Eastern Carpathians, Romania): sedimentological, paleontological and petrographic approaches. Geologica Carpathica60(5), 397–417.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RöglF.
    [1999] Mediterranean and Paratethys. Facts and hypotheses of an Oligocene to Miocene paleogeography (short overview). Geologica Carpathica50(4), Bratislava, 339–349.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SăndulescuM.
    [1988] Cenozoic Tectonic History of the Carpathians. In: RoydenLH, HorvathF. (eds.)The Pannonian Basin: a study of basin evolution. AAPG Memoir45, 17–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ŞtefănescuM., PopescuI., ŞtefănescuM., IvanV., MelinteM. & StănescuV.
    , [1993] Aspects of the possibilities of the lithological correlation of the Oligocene-Lower Miocene deposits of the Buzău Valley. Romanian Journal of Stratigraphy75, 83–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ZoltánS. & Donald R.Lowe
    [2004] Textural trends in turbidites and slurry beds from the Oligocene flysch of the East Carpathians, Romania. International Association of Sedimentologist, Sedimentology51, 945–972.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412669
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412669
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error