1887

Abstract

Summary

Modern surface related multiple elimination techniques use sparsity of the (primary) Greens functions in order to constrain the inversion process.

In this paper we compare Estimation of Primaries by Sparse Inversion (EPSI; ) and its refinement called robust EPSI ( ) on a number of real datasets. The EPSI algorithm uses a multitude of inversion parameters such as sparsity per gradient update and windowing in time to constrain the solution.

The robust EPSI method enforces sparsity via l1-norm minimization, essentially using only the target residual as a parameter. We extended robust EPSI to include reconstruction of the near offsets, which was missing in the original work.

We found that, for the datasets investigated, robust EPSI yields fewer artifacts and more reliable amplitudes in the region of the reconstructed near offset data.

This is the first real data application of the robust EPSI method to reconstruction of the near offsets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412692
2015-06-01
2020-07-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fokkema, J. and van den Berg, P.
    [1993] Seismic applications of acoustic reciprocity. Elsevier Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lin, T. and Herrmann, F.
    [2013] Robust estimation of primaries by sparse inversion via one-norm minimization. Geophysics, 78, R133–R150.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Van Groenestijn, G. and Verschuur, D.
    [2009] Estimating primaries by sparse inversion and application to near-offset data reconstruction. Geophysics, 74, A23–A28.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412692
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412692
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error