1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic data conditioning, quality control during processing and proper well to seismic calibration is important prior to deriving attributes and reservoir properties from seismic data.

Pre and post stack well to seismic ties, wavelet estimation and synthetic forward modelling at calibration wells will enables uncertainty assessment of the seismic data to improve imaging and data quality during processing.

A case study to illustrate the impact of analysing critical products during seismic processing with special care in phase stability and relative amplitude preservation to obtain seismic data suitable for reservoir characterization and quantitative interpretation will be described.

The study area is covered by 3D seismic acquired in 2010 and includes wells with a complete set of acoustic logs, necessary for quantitative analysis in the reservoir section, which consists of a complex Upper Jurassic Lower Cretaceous siliciclastic carbonate mixed system.

The intermediate processed products, in form of full stack and small pre stack gathers volumes around calibration wells, needs to be adapted to each processing project based on objectives, subsurface geology and available seismic and well data, and are considered to provide an important business impact at different scales, from exploration to development, in areas where quantitative seismic interpretation is intended.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412754
2015-06-01
2020-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T. and Mavko, G.
    [2005] Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk, Chapter 4 Common techniques for quantitative seismic interpretation. Cambridge University Press, 168–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChopraS. and CastagnaJ.
    [2014] AVO, Chapter 5 Factors that affect seismic amplitudes and processing for AVO analysis. Investigations in Geophysics, 16, SEG, 69–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sheriff, E., Brown, A. and Malcolm Lansley, R.
    [2010] Methods and Applications in Reservoir Geophysics, Chapter 2 The Supporting Technologies, Fundamentals of Reservoir Geophysics. Investigations in Geophysics, 15, SEG, 101–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Singleton, S.
    [2009] The effects of seismic data conditioning on prestack simultaneous impedance inversion. The Leading Edge, 27(1), 260–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yilmaz, O. and Doherty, S.
    [1989] Seismic Data Processing, Chapter 11 Reservoir Geophysics. Investigations in Geophysics, SEG, 1793–2000.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412754
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412754
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error