1887

Abstract

Summary

Pore pressure prediction is a key step for safe well drilling operations. This prediction is usually performed deriving a velocity-pressure relationship calibrated to a reference well. However, in the last decades, several methods commonly applied in hydrocarbon exploration have been extended to predict anomalous pressure values directly from seismic data. Among these the Amplitude Versus Angle (AVA) technique has received many attentions. In this work we show that the expected pressure effect on the elastic rock properties is very different from the gas-effect. This makes the classical AVA attributes used for lithology and fluid prediction ineffective in highlighting pressure anomalies. Therefore, we propose a new AVA attribute that can be used to evidence the decrease in P and S impedances that may be associated to overpressured formations. This attribute can be easily derived from the intercept and gradient values computed by means of the Shuey equation. To demonstrate the applicability of this new attribute for pore pressure prediction we show different applications to field datasets over already drilled prospects where overpressures have been encountered. In all cases this attribute shows anomalous responses in correspondence to overpressured layers and then it proves to be effective in highlighting anomalous fluid pressure regimes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412855
2015-06-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., and Mavko, G.
    [2005] Quantitative seismic interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carcione, J. M., and Tinivella, U.
    [2001] The seismic response to overpressure: a modelling study based on laboratory, well and seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(5), 523–539.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castagna, J. P., and Smith, S. W.
    [1994] Comparison of AVO indicators: A modeling study. Geophysics, 59(12), 1849–1855.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutta, N. C.
    [2002] Geopressure prediction using seismic data: Current status and the road ahead. Geophysics, 67(6), 2012–2041.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Huffman, A. R.
    [2002] The future of pore-pressure prediction using geophysical methods. The Leading Edge, 21(2), 199–205.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mallick, S., and Dutta, N. C.
    [2002] Shallow water flow prediction using prestack waveform inversion of conventional 3D seismic data and rock modeling. The Leading Edge, 21(7), 675–680.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412855
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201412855
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error