1887

Abstract

Summary

The goals of this work are to present a source imaging technique from seismic waveforms using time-reversed wavefield extrapolation without picking the seismic first arrivals, to verify the method by imaging of synthetic data and to apply to a real data from microseismic monitoring in a geothermal field. Time-reversed wavefield extrapolation is implemented by first reversing the measured wavefields and then treating these as time-varying boundary values at the corresponding sensor positions. In the implementation, the wavefield extrapolations are performed by solving 3D acoustic wave equation with finite difference method. In each time step, wavefield envelopes are calculated. A search criteria is employed to find the location of high envelope values. The final image is created by stacking extrapolated wavefield at the corresponding time step. The source location is indicated by the brightness of accumulated wavefield envelopes. Synthetic example shows that the method works well with sparse wavefield sampling, i.e., very few receivers number. The application of the method to a real data monitoring shown an obvious indication that microseismic locations are located in a NW direction which is very similar to dominant fault trend around the area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141300
2014-06-16
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gajewski, D. and Tessmer, E.
    [2005] Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization. Geophys. J. Int, 163, 276–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kao, H. and Shan, S.J.
    [2004] The source-scanning algorithm: mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space. Geophys. J. Int, 157, 589–594.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lomax, A., Virieux, J., Voulant, P. and Berge-Thierry, C.
    [2000] Introduction of a metropolis-gibbs method and comparison with linear locations. In: Thurber, C.H. and Rabinowitz, N. (Eds.)Advances in seismic event location. Kluwer Academic publisher, chap. Probabilistic earthquake location in 3D and layered models, 101–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. McMechan, G.A., Luetgert, J.H. and Mooney, W.D.
    [1985] Imaging of earthquake sources in long valley caldera, california, 1983. Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 75(4), 1005–1020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Waldhauser, F. and Ellsworth, W.L.
    [2000] A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern hayward fault, california. Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 90, 1353–1368.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wibowo, H.
    [2006] Spatial data analysis and integration for regional-scale geothermal prospectivity mapping, West Java, Indonesia. Msc thesis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141300
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141300
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error