1887

Abstract

Summary

Unconventional tough gas reservoirs in low-net-to-gross fluvial stratigraphic intervals may constitute a secondary source of fossil energy to prolong the gas supply in the future. To date, however, production from these thin-bedded, fine-grained reservoirs has been hampered by the economic risks associated with the uncertainties in their geometry, spatial distribution and reservoir properties. This study aims to provide a better insight into the reservoir architecture and tough gas reservoir potential of stacked and interconnected crevasse splays in a fluvial floodplain stratigraphy. Despite their thickness not exceeding decimetre scale, the surface area of individual crevasse splays may be up to several square kilometres and intervals of stacked and interconnected crevasse splays range up to several metres in thickness. Through incision of consecutive crevasse splays into underlying lobes and the channel fill of cut-through avulsed channels, sand-on-sand contact is established, effectively connecting individual splays. The net reservoir volume of single crevasse splays ranges up to several hundred thousand cubic metres, yielding GIIP estimations in the order of several million cubic metres. For intervals of stacked and interconnected crevasse splays, these figures are up to one order of magnitude higher, making them suitable as a secondary reservoir capacity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413027
2015-06-01
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Donselaar, M.E., Cuevas Gozalo, M.C. and Moyano, S.
    [2013] Avulsion processes at the terminus of low-gradient semi-arid fluvial systems: lessons from the Río Colorado, Altiplano endorheic Basin, Bolivia. Sedimentary Geology, 283, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Donselaar, M.E., Overeem, I., Reichwein, J.H.C. and Visser, C.A.
    [2011] Mapping of fluvial fairways in the Ten Boer Member, Southern Permian Basin. The Permian Rotliegend of The Netherlands, SEPM special publication, 98, 105–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher, J.A., Nichols, G.J. and Waltham, D.A.
    [2007] Unconfined flow deposits in distal sectors of fluvial distributary systems: examples from the Miocene Luna and Huesca systems, northern Spain. Sedimentary Geology, 195, 55–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hampton, B.A and Horton, B.K.
    [2007] Sheetflow fluvial processes in a rapidly subsiding basin, Altiplano plateau, Bolivia. Sedimentology, 54(5), 1121–1148.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones, H.L. and Hajek, E.A.
    [2007] Characterizing avulsion stratigraphy in ancient alluvial deposits. Sedimentary Geology, 202, 124–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kraus, M.J.
    [2002] Basin-scale changes in floodplain paleosols: implications for interpreting alluvial architecture. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 72, 500–509.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, J., Donselaar, M.E., Hosseini Aria, S.E., Koenders, R. and Oyen, A.M.
    [2014] Landsat imagery-based visualisation of the geomorphological development at the terminus of a dryland river system. Quaternary International, 352, 100–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nichols, G.J. and Fisher, J.A.
    [2007] Processes, facies and architecture of fluvial distributary system deposits. Sedimentary Geology, 195, 75–90.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413027
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error