1887

Abstract

Summary

The Kungurian salt domes are widely pervasive in the Pre-Caspian depression, so that the post-salt Upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic deposits disturbed considerably by salt tectonics. Salt structures formed mainly in the upper Permian time, at the end of which salt massifs broke this thick stratum and they were intensively dislocated. In the Mesozoic period, there was a moderate redistribution of salt, which resulted in uplift of Triassic to CretaИceous deposits on the top of salt bodies. The post-salt section covering Kungurian salt bodies are affected by salt movements. Most of post-salt highs above salt stock or walls are faulted. It causes to form different trapp types such as faulted anticline traps, turtle back structures, overhang structures, four-way dipping structures, etc. Other potential of stratigraphic traps anticipated in the area are pinch-out type, unconformity-related type, etc. The modern seismic technology improves the ability to map the structure of post-salt sequences in depressions between salt domes, resulting in new types of structures such as subtle anticline in depressions against slopes of salt domes. These structures recognized mainly in Upper Permian rocks. Formation of traps related to the halokinesis of non-uniform withdrawal of salt into adjacent domes during emplacement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413147
2015-06-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June2014, 1–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ulmishek, G.F.
    [2001] Petroleum Geology and Resources of the North Caspian Basin, Kazakhstan and Russia. By U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2201-B. Version 1.0.2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Soloviev, B.A.
    [1992] The evolution stages and oil and gas potential of sedimentary cover of the Pre-Caspian depression. Oil and Gas Geology, 08. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiryukhin, L.G., Obryadchikov, O.S, Konstantinov, A.A., Bulekbayev, Z.E., Marchenko, O.N. et.al.
    [1981] Geological Settings and oil-gas bearing prospectivety of pre-salt carbonates at the Eastern Boundary of the Pre-Caspian Depression. Oil and Gas Geology, 11. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barde, J.-P., Gralla, P., Harwijanto, J. and Marsky, J.
    [2002] Exploration at the Eastern Edge of the Precaspian Basin: Impact of Data Integration on Upper Permian and Triassic Prospectivity. AAPG Bulletin, 86(3), 399–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Volozh, Y., Talbot, C. and Ismail-Zadeh, A.
    [2003] Salt structures and hydrocarbons in the Pricaspian basin. AAPG Bulletin, 87(2), 313–334.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuandykov, B.M. Obryadchikov, O.S. and Taskinbayev, K.M.
    [2011] Specifics of Geological Development of Caspian Block Structure. Search and discovery Article # 10309, Posted March 18, 2011. Adopted from oral presentation at AAPG European Region Annual Conference, Kiev, Ukraine, October 17–19, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413147
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error