1887

Abstract

Summary

The unsupervised facies classification conventionally uses the amplitude magnitude information as the input. When there is a big magnitude difference in the seismic data, it is difficult to identify patterns in the weak amplitudes. Here, we use the pattern of the amplitude variations as the input to the classification. Tests on a 3D seismic volume show that the variation pattern helps the classification to identify the patterns within the area with weak amplitudes. The produced 3D facies volume enables a detailed facies analysis on the target interval in a carbonate reservoir.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413173
2015-06-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Coléou, T., Poupon, M. and Azbel, K.
    [2003] Unsupervised seismic facies classification: A review and comparison of techniques and implementation. The Leading Edge, 10, 942–953.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kohonen, T.
    [1995] Self-organizing maps. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Marroquín, I.D., Brault, J.J. and Hart, B.S.
    [2009] A visual data-mining methodology for seismic facies analysis: Part 1 – Testing and comparison with other unsupervised clustering methods. Geophysics, 74, P1–P11.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2009] A visual data-mining methodology for seismic facies analysis: Part 2 – Application to 3D seismic data. Geophysics, 74, P13–P23.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, Y.
    [2012] Reservoir characterization based on seismic spectral variations. Geophysics, 77(7), M89–M95.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413173
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413173
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error