1887

Abstract

Summary

Time–lapse 3D surface seismic monitoring at the Ketzin CO2 storage pilot site has provided time-lapse images of the spreading plume, which has been interpreted as being caused by fluid saturation changes only. The integration of seismic AVO/AVA modeling and petrophysical experiments on core samples from the Ketzin reservoir support the interpretation of the field data by demonstrating that pressure has a rather minor impact on the seismic amplitudes at the Ketzin site. In this study Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) analysis has been applied to the baseline and the latest 3D repeat data set to investigate the real AVO response from the top of the sandstone reservoir after the injection of ∼ 61 kT of CO2. The results show a good agreement with the modeling results, indicating that CO2 saturation effect dominates the time-lapse seismic signature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413303
2015-06-01
2020-01-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aki, K. & Richards, P. G.
    , 1980. Quantitative Seismology, W. H. Freeman & Co.Zoeppritz, K. [1919] On the Reflection and Propagation of Seismic Waves. Erdbebenwellen VIIB, Gottinger Nachrichten. I, 66–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. IvandicM., Juhlin, C., LüthS., BergmannP., KashubinA., Sopher, D., Ivanova, A., Baumann, G., Henninges, J.
    , [2015] Geophysical monitoring at the Ketzin pilot site for CO2 storage: New insights into the plume evolution. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 32, 90–105, ISSN 1750–5836, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.10.015.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ivanova, A., Kashubin, A., Juhojuntti, N., Kummerow, J., Henninges, J., Juhlin, C., Lüth, S., Ivandic, M.
    , [2012] Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany. Geophysical Prospecting, 60(5), 957–973, doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2478.2012.01045.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2478.2012.01045.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Ivanova, A., Bergmann, P., Kummerow, J., Yang, C., Lüth, S., Juhlin, C.
    , [2013b] Seismic modeling of the AVO/AVA response to CO2 injection at the Ketzin site, Germany. Energy Proc. 40, 490–498, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.08.056.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JuhlinC., Giese, R., Zinck–JørgensenK., CosmaC., Kazemeini, H., Juhojuntti, N., Lüth, S., Norden, B., Fürster, A.
    , [2007] 3D baseline seismics at Ketzin, Germany: The CO2SINK project. Geophysics, 72, B121–B132, doi:10.1190/1.2754667.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2754667 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kazemeini, S.H., Juhlin, C., Fomel, S.
    , [2010] Monitoring CO2 response on surface seismic data; a rock physics and seismic modeling feasibility study at the CO2 sequestration site, Ketzin, Germany. J. Appl. Geophys.71(4), 109–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Martens, S., Möller, F., Streibel, M., Liebscher, A. and the Ketzin Group
    , [2014] Completion of five years of safe CO2 injection and transition to the post-closure phase at the Ketzin pilot site. Energy Procedia59, 190–197.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413303
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413303
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error