1887

Abstract

Summary

Seismic attenuation plays an important role in real Earth and contains valuable information about the subsurface. To recover spatial distributions of both velocity and quality factor Q, in this work we investigate the applicability of 2D viscoacoustic full waveform inversion (FWI) to synthetic marine reflection data. Viscoacoustic FWI is a multiparameter inverse problem, and suffers from the cross-talk between different parameter classes. Based on the 2D Marmousi model, we investigate the cross-talk using spatially correlated and uncorrelated models of velocity and attenuation. Our results show a good reconstruction of the velocity model and satisfactory recovery of Q only in the shallow areas. With increasing depth we observe a stronger footprint of the velocity model. Nevertheless, the fit of synthetic and recorded seismograms is excellent. This can be interpreted either as low sensitivity of the synthetic data to attenuation properties in deep parts or as cross-talk with explanation of attenuation-related data misfit by the velocity model. We find that the investigation of multiparameter inverse problems with (highly) spatially uncorrelated parameters has to be considered as a necessary step to verify the reliability of inversion strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413406
2015-06-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Askan, A., Akcelik, V., Bielak, J. and Ghattas, O.
    [2007] Full waveform inversion for seismic velocity and anelastic losses in heterogeneous structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(6), 1990–2008, doi:10.1785/0120070079.
    https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070079 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanch, J., Robertsson, J. and Symes, W.
    [1995] Modeling of a constant q: Methodology and algorithm for an efficient and optimally inexpensive viscoelastic technique. Geophysics, 60(1), 176–184, doi:10.1190/1.1443744.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443744 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohlen, T.
    [2002] Parallel 3D viscoelastic finite difference seismic modelling. Computers and Geosciences, 28, 887–899.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kamei, R. and Pratt, R.G.
    [2013] Inversion strategies for visco-acoustic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 194(2), 859–884, doi:10.1093/gji/ggt109.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt109 [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurzmann, A., Przebindowska, A., Köhn, D. and Bohlen, T.
    [2013] Acoustic full waveform tomography in the presence of attenuation: a sensitivity analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 195(2), 985–1000, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt305.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt305 [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, H.P., Anderson, D.L. and Kanamori, H.
    [1976] Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity; implications for seismology and mantle composition. Geophysical Journal International, 47(1), 41–58, doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.1976.tb01261.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1976.tb01261.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Plessix, R.E.
    [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–503, doi:10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2006.02978.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Song, Z., Williamson, P. and Pratt, R.
    [1995] Frequency-domain acoustic-wave modeling and inversion of cross-hole data: Part ii – inversion method, synthetic experiments and real-data results. Geophysics, 60(3), 796–809, doi:10.1190/1.1443818.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443818 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413406
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413406
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error