1887

Abstract

Summary

In the field of seismic interferometry using noise, surface waves and body waves between receivers have been retrieved by crosscorrelating recordings of uncorrelated noise sources to extract useful subsurface information. When the positions of the noise sources are known, inter-source interferometry can be applied to retrieve the wavefileds between sources, thus turning sources into virtual receivers. Previous applications of this form of interferometry assume impulsive point sources or transient sources with similar signatures. We investigate the requirements of applying inter-source seismic interferometry using drill-bit noise to retrieve the reflection responses at those positions. We show that an accurate estimate of the source function is essential for such application. The preprocessing involves using standard seismic-while-drilling procedures, such as pilot crosscorrelation and pilot deconvolution to remove the drill-bit signatures in the data, and then applying crosscorrelation interferometry. Provided that pilot signals are reliable, drill-bit data can be redatumed from surface to the depth of boreholes using this inter-source interferometry approach without any velocity information of the medium. We show that a well-positioned image below the borehole can be obtained with just a simple velocity model using these reflection responses. We also discuss some of the practical hurdles that restrict its application offshore.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413571
2015-06-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Curtis, A., H.Nicolson, D.Halliday, J.Trampert, and B.Baptie
    . 2009. Virtual seismometers in the subsurface of the Earth from seismic interferometry. Nature Geoscience2, 700 – 704.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Draganov, D., X.Campman, J.Thorbecke, A.Verdel, and K.Wapenaar
    . 2013. Seismic exploration-scale velocities and structure from ambient seismic noise (>1 Hz). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth118, 4345 – 4360.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Snieder, R.
    . 2004. Extracting the Green's function from the correlation of coda waves: A derivation based on stationary phase. Phys. Rev. E69, no. 4, 046610.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Poletto, F., and F.Miranda
    . 2004. Seismic While Drilling: Fundamentals of Drill-Bit Seismic for Exploration. Pergamon. 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Poletto, F., P.Corubolo, and P.Comelli
    . 2010. Drill-bit seismic interferometry with and without pilot signals. Geophysical Prospecting58, 257–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Poletto, F., F.Miranda, P.Corubolo, A.Schleifer, and P.Comelli
    . 2014. Drill-bit seismic monitoring while drilling by downhole wired-pipe telemetry. Geophysical Prospecting62, 702 – 718.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rector, J., and B.Marion
    . 1991. The use of drill-bit energy as a downhole seismic source. Geophysics56, 628 – 634.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vasconcelos, I., and R.Snieder
    . 2008. Interferometry by deconvolution: Part 2 - Theory for elastic waves and application to drill-bit seismic imaging. Geophysics73, S129 – S141.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wapenaar, K., and J.Fokkema
    . 2006. Green’s function representations for seismic interferometry. Geophysics71, SI33 – SI46.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413571
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413571
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error