1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a surface-wave natural migration method that does not require velocity models to migrate backscattered surface waves to their projected locations on the surface. This method uses recorded Green's functions instead of simulated Green's functions. The key assumptions are that the scattering bodies are within the depth interrogated by the surface waves, and the Green's functions are recorded with dense receiver sampling. This natural migration takes into account all orders of multiples, mode conversions, and non-linear effects of surface waves in the data. The natural imaging formulas are derived for both active source and ambient-noise data, and computer simulations show that natural migration can effectively image near-surface heterogeneities with typical distributions of ambient-noise sources. We also present the results of applying natural migration to Long-Beach and US-Array passive data. The migration images highlight known discontinuities in surface-wave tomograms and correlate well with some of the prominent geological boundaries at two different scales: (1) the tectonic scale such as the edge of the Atlantic Plain Province in southeastern US and (2) the regional scale structure under Long Beach, California. The migration images provide complementary high-wavenumber information to the smoother surface-wave tomograms and can be used to refine the tomographic models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413572
2015-06-01
2020-07-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blonk, B., Herman, G. and Drijkoningen, G.
    [1995] An elastodynamic inverse scattering method for removing scattered surface waves from field data. Geophysics, 60(6), 1897–1905.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Campman, X. and Dwi Riyanti, C.
    [2007] Non-linear inversion of scattered seismic surface waves. Geophysical Journal International, 171(3), 1118–1125.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Campman, X., van Wijk, K., Scales, J. and Herman, G.
    [2005] Imaging and suppressing near-receiver scattered surface waves. Geophysics, 70(2), V21–V29.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hand, E.
    [2014] A boom in boomless seismology. Science, 345(6198), 720–721.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaslilar, A.
    [2007] Inverse scattering of surface waves: imaging of near-surface heterogeneities. Geophysical Journal International, 171(1), 352–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lin, F., Li, D., Clayton, R. and Hollis, D.
    [2013] High-resolution 3D shallow crustal structure in Long Beach, California: Application of ambient noise tomography on a dense seismic array. Geophysics, 78(4), Q45–Q56.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Riyanti, C.
    [2005] Modeling and Inversion of Scattered Surface waves. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuster, G.T.
    [2002] Reverse-time migration = generalized diffraction stack migration. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1280–1283.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Snieder, R.
    [1986] 3-D linearized scattering of surface waves and a formalism for surface wave holography. Geophysical Journal International, 84, 581–605.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu, H., Hanafy, S., Guo, B., Schuster, G.T. and Lin, F.C.
    [2014] Direct detection of near-surface faults by migration of back-scattered surface waves, 2135–2139.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413572
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413572
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error