1887

Abstract

Summary

The potential of experimental seismic modeling at reduced scale is explored since several years because it provides an intermediate step between numerical tests and geophysical campaigns on field sites. The MUSC system is designed as a reliable tool, able to produce multi-sources and multi-receivers experimental seismic data suitable for high-resolution imaging techniques like Full Waveform Inversion. However, experimental seismic modeling has limitations such as finite dimensions models used instead of realistic half-space models and three-dimensional seismic data generated by the point-source whereas most of wave propagation and imaging algorithms make use of two-dimensional forward modeling for numerical cost reasons. The main objective of the presented study is thus to improve the experimental seismic modeling to generate reproducible, realistic and suitable data which will be distributed in the scientific community. In this scope, we have: 1) refined the comparison between numerical and experimental data by generating experimental two-dimensional line-sources, 2) assessed the reproducibility of the source emitted in a model by the piezzo-electric transducer and 3) reduced efficiently the boundary reflections with the help of an adapted new geometry of the edges which absorbs a large band of the incident waves spectrum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413763
2015-09-06
2020-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bretaudeau, F., Brossier, R., Leparoux, D., Abraham, O. and Virieux, J.
    [2013] 2d elastic full-waveform imaging of the near-surface: application to synthetic and physical modelling data sets. Near Surface Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bretaudeau, F., Leparoux, D., Durand, O. and Abraham, O.
    [2011] Small-scale modeling of onshore seismic experiment: A tool to validate numerical modeling and seismic imaging methods. Geophysics, 76(5), T101–T112.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Komatitsch, D., Vilotte, J.P., Vai, R., Castillo-Covarrubias, J.M. and Sánchez-Sesma, F.J.
    [1998] The Spectral Element Method for Elastic Wave Equation: Application to 2-D and 3-D Seismic Problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 45, 1139–1164.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mainsant, G., Jongmans, D., Chambon, G., Larose, E. and Baillet, L.
    [2012] Shear-wave velocity as an indicator for rheological changes in clay materials: Lessons from laboratory experiments: S-wave velocity in clay. Geophysical Research Letters, 39.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pratt, R.G.
    [1999] Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics, 64(3), 888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schafer, M., Gross, L., Forbriger, T. and Bohlen, T.
    [2014] Line-source simulation for shallow-seismic data. part2: full-waveform inversion - a synthetic 2-d case study. Geophysical Journal International, 198, 1405–1418.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tatham, R.H., Goolsbee, D.V., Massell, W.F. and Nelson, H.R.
    [1983] Seismic shear-wave observations in a physical model experiment. Geophysics, 48(6), 688–701.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Valensi, R., Leparoux, D., Durand, O., Bretaudeau, F. and Cote, P.
    [2015] Multicomponent reduced scale seimic modeling : upgrade of the muse laboratory with application to polarization observations. Geophysical Journal International.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413763
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201413763
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error