Scalable and Robust BDDC Preconditioners for Reservoir and Electromagnetics Modeling

References

1. AmestoyP. R., DuffI. S., KosterJ. and L’ExcellentJ. Y.
   [2001] A fully asynchronous multi-frontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling, SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis with Applications23, 15–41.
   [Google Scholar]
2. BadiaS., MartinA. F. and PrincipeJ.
   [2014] A highly scalable parallel implementation of balancing domain decomposition by constraints, SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing36, C190–C218.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BalayS., AbhyankarS., AdamsM. F., BrownJ., BruneP., BuschelmanK., EijkhoutV., GroppW. D., KaushikD., KnepleyM. G., CurfmannMcInnes L., RuppK., SmithB. F., ZhangH.
   [2014] PETSc Web page, http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc.
4. BoffiD., BrezziF. and FortinM.
   [2013] Mixed finite element methods and applications, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics44.
   [Google Scholar]
5. CarcioneJ. M.
   [2010] Simulation of electromagnetic diffusion in anisotropic media, Progress in Electromagnetics Research B. 26, 425–450.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dohrmann, C. R.
   [2003] A preconditioner for substructuring based on constrained energy minimization. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing25, 246–258.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DohrmannC. R. and WidlundO. B.
   [2015] A BDDC algorithm with deluxe scaling for three-dimensional H(curl) problems, appeared electronically in April 2015 inCommunications in Pure and Applied Mathematics.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DongarraJ. et al.
   [2011] The international exascale software project roadmap, International Journal of High Performance Computing and Applications6, 1–58.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HaberE.
   [2015] Computational methods in geophysical electromagnetics, SIAM.
   [Google Scholar]
10. KimH. H. and ChungE. T.
    [2015] A BDDC algorithm with optimally enriched coarse spaces for two-dimensional elliptic problems with oscillatory and high contrast coefficients, Submitted.
    [Google Scholar]
11. KlawonnA., RheinbachO. and WidlundO. B.
    [2008] An analysis of a FETI-DP algorithm on irregular subdomains in the plane, SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis46, 2484–2504.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Klawonn, A. and Rheinbach, O.
    [2010]. Highly scalable parallel domain decomposition methods with an application to biomechanics, ZAMM Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics90, 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
13. KlawonnA., RadtkeP. and RheinbachO.
    [2015] FETI-DP methods with an adaptive coarse space. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis53, 297–320.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KolevT. V., VassilevskyP. S.
    [2009] Parallel auxiliary space AMG solver for H(curl) problems, Journal of Computational Mathematics27, 604–632.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KolevT. V., VassilevskyP. S.
    [2012] Parallel auxiliary space AMG solver for H(div) problems, SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing34.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LoggA. and WellsG. N.
    [2012] DOLFIN: automated finite element computing, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software37.
    [Google Scholar]
17. LiJ. and WidlundO. B
    [2006] FETI-DP, BDDC, and block Cholesky methods, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 66, 250–271.
18. MandelJ.
    [1993] Balancing domain decomposition, Communications in Applied Numerical Methods9, 233–241.
    [Google Scholar]
19. MandelJ., DohrmannC. R. and TezaurR.
    [2005] An algebraic theory for primal and dual substructuring methods by constraints, Applied Numerical Mathematics54, 167–193.
    [Google Scholar]
20. MandelJ., SousedikB. and DohrmannC. R.
    [2008] Multispace and multilevel BDDC, Computing3, 55–85
    [Google Scholar]
21. MandelJ., SousedikB. and SistekJ.
    [2012] Adaptive BDDC in three dimensions, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation82, 1812–1831.
    [Google Scholar]
22. OhD.-S., WidlundO. B. and DohrmannC. R.
    [2013] A BDDC algorithm for Raviart—Thomas vector fields, Courant Institute Technical Report TR2013-951.
    [Google Scholar]
23. PechsteinC. and DohrmannC. R.
    [2013] Modern domain decomposition methods BDDC, deluxe scaling, and an algebraic approach. Seminar talk, Linz, http://people.ricam.oeaw.ac.at/c.pechstein/pechstein-bddc2013.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
24. PechsteinC. and ScheichlR.
    [2008] Analysis of FETI methods for multiscale PDEs, Numerische Mathematik111, 293–333.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SistekJ, BrezinaJ. and SousedikB.
    [2015] BDDC for mixed-hybrid formulation of flow in porous media with combined mesh dimensions, http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.07085.
    [Google Scholar]
26. ToselliA.
    and WidlundO. B. [2005] Domain decomposition methods - Algorithms and theory, Springer Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
27. TuX.
    [2005] A BDDC algorithm for a mixed formulation of flow in porous media, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis20, 164–179
    [Google Scholar]
28. TuX.
    [2007] A BDDC algorithm for flow in porous media with a hybrid finite element discretization, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis26, 146–160.
    [Google Scholar]
29. WidlundO.B. and DohrmannC. R.
    [2014] BDDC deluxe Domain Decomposition, proceedings of the XXII International conference on Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
30. ZampiniS.
    [2014] Dual-primal methods for the cardiac bidomain model. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences24, 667–696.
    [Google Scholar]
31. ZampiniS.
    [2015] PCBDDC: a class of robust dual-primal methods in PETSc, Submitted.
    [Google Scholar]