1887

Abstract

Summary

A workflow for integrating full waveform inversion (FWI) with reflection tomography has been refined using narrow azimuth towed streamer (NATS) 3D seismic data from the North West Shelf (NWS) of Australia.

We show that FWI using relatively short offset NATS data with limited low frequency content can provide a high resolution velocity field if it is combined with reflection tomography in the workflow. Although other techniques exist for building an initial FWI model, reflection tomography was chosen here since a reasonably mature model was accessible from a project being run in parallel. Integration of reflection tomography and associated quality control (QC) practices into the time domain FWI model building sequence was found to be necessary to help the FWI converge to a satisfactory solution when turning ray energy was limited or non-existent. Investigation of typical FWI parameters was also necessary to refine each frequency update.

We also show comparisons of inversions for acoustic and elastic impendace from using FWI and reflection tomography data from this area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141422
2020-02-01
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Houbiers, H., Wiarda, E., Mispel, J., Koeninger, C., Nikolenko, D., Vigh, D. and Thompson, M.
    [2012] 3D Full-waveform inversion at Mariner – a shallow North Sea reservoir. International Geophysical Conference and Oil and Gas Exhibition, Istanbul, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lailly, P.
    [1983] The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations: Conference on Inverse Scattering, Theory and Application. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Expanded Abstracts, 206–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pratt, R.G.
    [1990] Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography. Part II: Elastic wave-equation method. Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 311–330.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shah, N., Warner, M., Nangoo, T., Umpleby, A., Štekl, I., Morgan, J. and Guasch, L.
    [2012] Quality assured full-waveform inversion: Ensuring starting model adequacy. 81st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, SI3.5.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Shin, C. and Ha, W.
    [2008] A comparison between the behaviour of objective functions for waveform inversion in the frequency and Laplace domains. Geophysics, 73(5), VE119–VE133.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sirgue, L., Etgen, J.T. and Albertin, U.
    [2008] 3D frequency-domain waveform inversion using time-domain finite-difference methods. 70th Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, F022.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sirgue, L., Denel, B. and Gao, F.
    [2011] integrating 3D Full Waveform Inversion into Depth Imaging Projects. Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2354–2358.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vigh, D. and Starr, E.W.
    [2008] 3D plane-wave full-waveform inversion. Geophysics, 73(5), VE135–VE144.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Warner, M.R., Morgan, J.V., Umpleby, A., Štekl, I. and Guasch, L.
    [2012] Which physics for full-wavefield inversion. 74th Annual International Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, W029.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141422
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141422
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Published online: 01 Feb 2020
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error