In frontier exploration, explorationists often struggle with lack of information, particularly due to lack of well data. Exploration thus relies primarily on elastic (e.g., 2D/3D seismic) and electric (e.g., 3D controlled-source electromagnetic surveys) data sets between the few (if any) wildcat boreholes. Traditional exploration involving rock physics relies almost exclusively on elastic parameters derived from seismic inversion, in itself a challenging task without adequate well control. Inversion of CSEM data, on the other hand, is much more robust in the absence of well control and provides a geologically meaningful representation of sub-surface resistivity. Having two geophysical data sets sensitive to the same subsurface, but relying on different physics, reduces uncertainty in frontier exploration if these are integrated at the interpretation stage. Furthermore, universal rock physical relationships linking elastic and electric properties to various geological parameters (e.g., Hashin-Shtrikman bounds, Archie’s Law) can be used to relate the two measurement types to geological drivers, such as porosity and fluid trends. Here we present a simple workflow incorporating both elastic and electric data sets in frontier exploration, combining them using cross-plotting. We illustrate how the workflow can be used on a regional-scale case study where resistivity and velocity maps can be used together to provide a qualitative background porosity map.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Archie, G.E.
    [1942] The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics. Petroleum Technology, 1422, 54–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Avseth, P.
    [2010] Explorational Rock Physics – The Link Between Geological Processes and Geophysical Observables. Petroleum Geoscience, 403–426. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baltar, D. and Barker, N.D.
    [submitted] Prospectivity Evaluation with CSEM. AAPG Bulletin.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baltar, D. and Roth, F.
    2013, Reserves estimation methods for prospect evaluation with 3D CSEM data. First Break, 31, 103–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Constable, S.
    [2010] Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration. Geophysics, 75(5), 75A67–75A81.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Datta Gupta, S., Chatterjee, R. and Farooqui, M. Y.
    [2012] Rock physics template (RPT) analysis of well logs and seismic data for lithology and fluid classification in Cambay Basin. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 101(5), 1407–1426.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fanavoll, S., Gabrielsen, P. and Ellingsrud, S.
    [2014] CSEM as a tool for better exploration decisions: Case studies from the Barents Sea, Norwegian Continental Shelf. Interpretation, 2(3), SH55–SH66.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Henriksen, E., Ryseth, A.E., Larssen, G.B., Heide, T., Rønning, K., Sollid, K. and Stoupakova, A.V.
    [2011a] Chapter 10 Tectonostratigraphy of the greater Barents Sea: implications for petroleum systems. In: Spencer, A.M., Embry, A.F., Gautier, D.L., Stoupakova, A.V. and Sørensen, K. (Eds) Arctic Petroleum Geology. Geological Society, Memoir #35, London, 163–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Henriksen, E., Bjørnseth, H.M., Hals, T.K., Heide, T., Kiryukhina, T., Kløvjan, O.S., Larssen, G.B., Ryseth, A.E., Rønning, K., Sollid, K. and Stoupakova, A.
    [2011b] Chapter 17 Uplift and erosion of the greater Barents Sea: impact on prospectivity and petroleum systems. In: Spencer, A.M., Embry, A.F., Gautier, D.L., Stoupakova, A.V. and Sørensen, K. (Eds) Arctic Petroleum Geology. Geological Society, Memoir #35, London, 271–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ohm, S.E., Karlsen, D.A. and Austin, T.J.F.
    [2008] Geochemically driven exploration models in uplifted areas: Examples from the Norwegian Barents Sea. AAPG Bulletin, 92(9), 1191–1223.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error