1887

Abstract

Summary

We describe a methodology for inferring the change in subsurface model parameters from time-lapse seismic data within a hierarchical Bayesian framework, where the time-lapse and baseline surveys may have different acquisition geometries. Conventional methods for processing time-lapse data with differing acquisition geometries involve inverting the baseline and time-lapse datasets separately and subtracting the inverted models; however, such methods do not correctly account for differing model uncertainty between surveys due to differences in illumination and observational noise. Within the hierarchical Bayesian setting, the solution to the time-lapse inverse problem is given by the marginal maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of the time-lapse change, which seeks the most probable time-lapse change over all probable baseline models described by the data. We present a framework for computing the marginal MAP estimate using the expectation-maximization (E-M) algorithm, which iteratively performs sequential estimation of the time-lapse change and the baseline model. Our algorithm is validated numerically on synthetic data simulated from the Marmousi model (with a time-lapse perturbation), where the hierarchical Bayesian estimates significantly outperform conventional time-lapse inversion results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141476
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ayeni, G. and Biondi, B.
    [2010] Target-oriented joint least-squares migration/inversion of time-lapse seismic data sets. Geophysics, 75(3), R61–R73.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Buland, A. and El Ouair, Y.
    [2006] Bayesian time-lapse inversion. Geophysics, 71(3), R43–R48.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M. and Rubin, D.B.
    [1977] Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hager, W.W. and Zhang, H.
    [2006] A survey of nonlinear conjugate gradient methods. Pacific journal of Optimization, 2(1), 35–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hong, T. and Sen, M.
    [2008] Joint bayesian inversion for reservoir characterization and uncertainty quantification. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 27, 1481–1485.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. McLachlan, G.J. and Krishnan, T.
    [1997] The EM algorithm and extensions. Chichester: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodi, W.L. and Myers, S.C.
    [2013] Computation of traveltime covariances based on stochastic models of velocity heterogeneity. Geophysical Journal International, 194(3), 1582–1595.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, Z. and Huang, L.
    [2013] Double-difference elastic-waveform inversion with prior information for time-lapse monitoring. Geophysics, 78(6), R259–R273.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141476
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141476
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error