1887

Abstract

Summary

Migration Velocity Analysis aims at estimating the background, low frequency velocity model. Depth images at fixed surface locations can be obtained and are called Common Image Gathers. On these images, classical artifacts, such as migration smiles, impact the Differential Semblance functional and its gradient, needed for an iterative update of the velocity model. To limit these artifacts, we derive a quantitative migration as an automatic way to compensate for illumination. We first indicate that the migrated image can be obtained as the first gradient of an objective function defined in the data domain. In quantitative migration, we introduce a weight in this data-domain objective function. Based on a simple synthetic model, we show step by step how Migration Velocity Analysis becomes more robust.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141496
2014-06-16
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ChaurisH. and NobleM.
    [2001] Two-dimensional velocity macro model estimation from seismic reflection data by local differential semblance optimization: applications to synthetic and real data sets. Geophysical Journal International, 144, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChaurisH., LameloiseC.A. and DonnoD.
    [2013] Migration Velocity Analysis with Reflected and Transmitted Waves. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De HoopM. and StolkC.
    [2005] Modeling of seismic data in the downward continuation approach. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 65, 1388–1406.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FeiW. and WilliamsonP.
    [2010] On the gradient artifacts in migration velocity analysis based on differential semblance optimization. 80th SEG meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4071–4076.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. JinS., MadariagaR., VirieuxJ. and LambaréG.
    [1992] Two-dimensional asymptotic iterative elastic inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 108, 575–588.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MulderW.A.
    [2013] Subsurface offset behavior in velocity analysis with extended reflectivity images. Geophysical Prospecting, 62, 17–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PlessixR.-E.
    [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167, 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ShenP. and SymesW.W.
    [2008] Automatic velocity analysis via shot profile migration. Geophysics, 73, VE49–VE59.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. VyasM. and TangY.
    [2010] Gradients for wave-equation migration velocity analysis. 80th SEG meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4077–4081.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141496
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141496
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error