1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. ECMOR XIV - 14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

The In-Situ Upgrading (ISU) of bitumen and oil shale is a very challenging process to model numerically because a large number of components need to be modelled using a system of equations that are both highly non-linear and strongly coupled. Operator splitting methods are one way of potentially improving computational performance. Each numerical operator in a process is modelled separately, allowing the best solution method to be used for the given numerical operator. A significant drawback to the approach is that decoupling the governing equations introduces an additional source of numerical error, known as splitting error. Obviously the best splitting method for modelling a given process is the one that minimises the splitting error whilst improving computational performance over that obtained from using a fully implicit approach.

Although operator splitting has been widely used for the modelling of reactive-transport problems, it has not yet been applied to the modelling of ISU. One reason is that it is not clear which operator splitting technique to use. Numerous such techniques are described in the literature and each leads to a different splitting error. While this error has been extensively analysed for linear operators for a wide range of methods, the results observed cannot be extended to general non-linear systems. It is therefore not clear which of these techniques is most appropriate for the modelling of ISU.

In this paper we investigate the application of various operator splitting techniques to the modelling of the ISU of bitumen and oil shale. The techniques were tested on a simplified model of the physical system in which a solid or heavy liquid component is decomposed by pyrolysis into lighter liquid and gas components. The operator splitting techniques examined include the Sequential Split Operator (SSO), the Strang-Marchuk split operator (SMSO) and the Iterative Split Operator (ISO). They were evaluated on various test cases by considering the evolution of the discretization error as a function of the size of the time-step compared with the results obtained from a fully implicit simulation. We observed that the error was minimum for a splitting scheme where the thermal conduction was performed first, followed by the chemical reaction step and finally the heat and mass convection operator (SSO-CKA). This method was then applied to a more realistic model of the ISU of bitumen with multiple components.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141850
2014-09-08
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141850
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barry, D.A., Miller, C.T., Culligan, P. and Bajracharya, K.
    [1997] Analysis of Split-Operator Methods for Non-Linear and Multispecies Groundwater Chemical Transport Models. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 43, 341–.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, R.M. and Stephens, D.J.
    [1981] The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. The Journal of Canadian Petroleum, 20(2), 90–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrayrou, J., Mose, R. and Behra, P.
    [2004] Operator-splitting procedures for reactive transport and comparison of mass balance errors. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 68, 268–.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Coats, K.H.
    [2003] IMPES Stability: Selection of Stable Timesteps. SPE Journal, 8(2), 181–187.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fan, Y., Durlofsky, L. and Tchelepi, H.
    [2010] Numerical Simulation of the In-Situ Upgrading of Oil Shale. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 2–4 February2009, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Farago, I., Boglarka, G. and Havasi, A.
    [2008] Additive and Iterative Operator Splitting Methods and Their Numerical Investigation. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 55, 2279–.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fowler, T. and Vinegar, H.
    [2009] Oil Shale ICP-Colorado Field Pilot. SPE Western Regional Meeting, 24–26 March2009, San Jose, California, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar, J., Fusetti, L. and Corre, B.
    [2011] Modeling In-Situ Upgrading of Extraheavy Oils/Tar Sands by Subsurface Pyrolysis. Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, 15–17 November2011, Alberta, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Lanser, D. and Verwer, J.
    [1999] Analysis of Operator Splitting for Advection-Diffusion-Reaction Problems from Air Pollution Modelling. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics111 (1999), 201–216, 111, 201–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyer, R.F., Attanasi, E.D. and Freeman, P.
    [2007] Heavy Oil and Natural Bitumen Resources in Geological Basins of the World. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–1084.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Mifflin, R.T., Watts, J.W., Weiser, A. and Rice, U.
    [1991] A Fully Coupled, Fully Implicit Reservoir Simulator for Thermal and Other Complex Reservoir Processes. SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, 17–20 February1991, Anaheim, California.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Pope, S.B. and Ren, Z.
    [2009] Efficient Implementation of Chemistry in Computational Combustion. Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 82(4), 437–453.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Snow, R.
    [2011] In-Situ Upgrading of Bitumen and Shale Oil by RF Electrical Heating. SPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, 12–14 December2011, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Strang, G.
    [1968] On the Constuction and Comparison of Difference Schemes. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 5(3), 506–517.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Valocchi, A.J. and Malmstead, M.
    [1992] Accuracy of Operator Splitting for Advection-Dispersion-Reaction Problems. Water Resources Research, 28(5), 1471–1476.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Watts, J.W.
    [1986] A Compositional Formulation of the Pressure and Saturation Equations. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1(3), 243–253.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Wilson, G.
    [1968] A Modified Redlich-Kwong EOS, Application to General Physical Data Calculations. Annual AIChE National Meeting, Cleveland, Ohio.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141850
Loading
Modelling In-situ Upgrading of Heavy Oil Using Operator Splitting Methods
Conference Proceedings 2014, 1 (2014); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141850
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141850
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20141850
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error