1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper introduces an approach to 3D modeling and inversion of the airborne electromagnetics (AEM) that is suited to arbitrarily complex earth models with very high conductivity contrasts and rugged topography, yet is fast enough to consider large surveys. We use a hybrid FE-IE method, which directly avoids errors associated with numerical differentiation and interpolation of the electric vector potentials at the edges of the elements containing the receiver. This approach is stable and accurate and for conductivity contrasts in excess of 10 :1, as is typically required for practical AEM interpretation. We incorporate the moving sensitivity domain method into this modeling framework to increase the modeling speed for an entire survey by several orders of magnitude. A case study for the 3D inversion of 90 line km of DIGHEM data from the Reid-Mahaffy test site is presented to demonstrate the efficacy of our method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142038
2014-09-08
2020-06-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cox, L. H. and M. S.Zhdanov
    , 2007, Large-scale 3D inversion of HEM data using a moving footprint: 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 467–470.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox, L. H., G. A.Wilson, and M. S.Zhdanov
    , 2010, 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint: Exploration Geophysics, 41, 250–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , 2012, 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data: Geophysics, 77, WB59–WB69.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hursán, G., and M. S.Zhdanov
    , 2002, Contraction integral equation method in three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling: Radio Science, 37, doi: 10.1029/2001RS002513.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RS002513 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ontario Geological Survey
    , 2000, Airborne magnetic and electromagnetic surveys, Reid-Mahaffy airborne geophysical test site survey: Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release Data (MRD)-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sattel, D
    , 2005, Inverting airborne electromagnetic data with Zohdy’s method: Geophysics, 70, G77–G85.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sugeng, F.
    , 1998, Modelling the 3D TDEM response using the 3D full-domain finite-element method based on the hexahedral edge-element technique: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 615–619.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sugeng, F., and A.Raiche
    , 2004, Modelling the electromagnetic response in complex geological structures using the 3D finite-element method based on the hexahedral and the tetrahedral edge-element technique: Presented at ASEG 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vallée, M., and R.Smith
    , 2009, Application of Occam’s inversion to airborne time-domain electromagnetics, The Leading Edge28(3), 284–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhdanov, M. S.
    , 2002, Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , 2009, Geophysical electromagnetic theory and methods: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142038
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20142038
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error