1887

Abstract

The finite-difference method is widely used for time-domain modelling of the wave equation because of its ease of implementation of high-order spatial discretization schemes, parallelization and computational efficiency. However, finite elements on tetrahedral meshes are more accurate in complex geometries near sharp interfaces. We compared the fourth-order finite-difference method to fourth-order continuous mass-lumped finite elements in terms of accuracy and computational cost. The results show that for simple models like a cube with constant density and velocity, the finite-difference method outperforms the finite-element method by at least an order of magnitude. For a model with interior complexity and topography, however, the finite elements are about two orders of magnitude faster than finite differences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20148578
2012-06-04
2021-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20148578
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error