1887

Abstract

Stacking velocities must be determined with extraordinary emphasis to obtain good sections, correctly interpretable from both the structural and the stratigraphic points of view. Detailed velocity analysis proved to be the most important and time-consuming processing step in the conventional CMP stacking procedure. This aspect involving high processing costs is the main drawback of the shallow seismic reflection. The Common Reflection Surface stack (CRS stack) method is a reliable alternative to the conventional CMP method, since it does not need the knowledge of a macro velocity model to produce a stacked section. In this contribution we process two dataset using both conventional CMP (with detailed velocity analyses) and CRS (without velocity analyses) stacking methods. The stacked sections, appearing very similar, prove that the CRS stack method is very a very useful tool in both shallow and ultra-shallow seismic reflection surveys.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20149401
2011-05-23
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.20149401
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error