1887

Abstract

Summary

Clay formations are present in reservoirs and earthquake faults, but their mechanical behaviors are still poorly understood, as they can vary from plastic (aseismic) to brittle (seismic). A decametric scale experiment, which aims to reactivate a natural fault by fluid injection was performed in shale materials. The injection area monitored by sensors measuring pressure, deformation and ground motion. Few tens of events were recorded with magnitude ranging between -4.3 and -3.7. Their spatio-temporal distribution, shows that most of the deformation induced by the injection is aseismic. Whether the seismicity is controlled by the fault architecture, mineralogy of fracture filling, fluid and/or stress state is then discussed. The fault damage zone architecture and mineralogy are of crucial importance as seismic slip mainly localizes on the sealed-with-calcite fractures which predominates in the fault damage zone. As no seismicity is observed in the close vicinity of the injection areas, the presence of fluid seems to prevent seismic slips. The fault core acts as an impervious hydraulic barrier that favors fluids confinement and pressurization. Therefore, the seismicity seems to be driven by the stress changes induced by the pressurized volume and the hydraulic permeability heterogeneity strongly influences the seismicity distribution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600024
2016-01-31
2024-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, E., Davey, H., Steinhoff, C. and Davis, T.
    [2013] Investigating the relationship between microseismic events and geomechanical variations in the Montney Shale reservoir–a case study. First break, 31(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Constantin, J., Peyaud, J.B., Vergely, P., Pagel, M. and Cabrera, J.
    [2004] Evolution of the structural fault permeability in argillaceous rocks in a polyphased tectonic context. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 25–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Das, I. and Zoback, M.
    [2013a] Long-period, long-duration seismic events during hydraulic stimulation of shale and tight-gas reservoirs -- Part 1: Waveform characteristics. Geophysics, 78(6), KS107-KS118.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2013b] Long-period long-duration seismic events during hydraulic stimulation of shale and tight gas reservoirs — Part 2: Location and mechanisms. Geophysics, 78(6), KS97–KS105.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Barros, L., Daniel, G., Guglielmi, Y., Rivet, D., Caron, H., Payre, X., Bergery, G., Castilla, R., Dick, P., Barbieri, E. and Gourlay, M.
    [2015] Fault structure, stress or pressure control of the seismicity in shale? Insights from a controlled experiment of fluid-induced fault reactivation, Submitted to J. Geophys. Res.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Derode, B., Guglielmi, Y., De Barros, L. and Cappa, F.
    [2015] Seismic responses to fluid pressure perturbations in a slipping fault. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3197–3203.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dick, P., Courbet, C., Wittebroodt, C., Dauzeres, A. and Matray, J-M.
    [2015] Internal structures of fault zones in low permeability formations and their relationship with fluid flow: insights from the Tournemire URL. Abstract, Clay Conference Brussels, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Guglielmi, Y., Cappa, F., Avouac, J.F., Henry, P., Elsworth, D.
    [2015a] Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip. Science, 348(6240), 1224–1226.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Guglielmi, Y., Elsworth, D., Cappa, F., Henry, P., Gout, C., Dick, P. and Durand, J.
    [2015b] In situ observations on the coupling between hydraulic diffusivity and displacements during fault reactivation in shales. Journal of Geophysical Research, In press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ikari, M.J., Saffer, D.M. and Marone, C.
    [2009] Frictional and hydrologic properties of clayrich fault gouge. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(B5), B05409.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kohli, A.H. and Zoback, M.D.
    [2013] Frictional properties of shale reservoir rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(9), 5109–5125.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Maxwell, S. and Norton, M.
    [2012] Enhancing shale gas reservoir characterization using hydraulic fracture microseismic data. First break, 30(2), 95–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Peng, Z. and Gomberg, J.
    [2010] An integrated perspective of the continuum between earthquakes and slow-slip phenomena. Nature Geoscience, 3, 599–607.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rutledge, J.T., Phillips, W.S. and Mayerhofer, M.J.
    [2004] Faulting induced by forced injection and fluid flow forced by faulting: an interpretation of hydraulic-fracture microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, Texas. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94(5), 1817–1830.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Shapiro, S.A. and Dinske, C.
    [2009] Fluid-induced seismicity: Pressure diffusion and hydraulic fracturing. Geophysical Prospecting, 57(2), 301–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tremosa, J., Arcos, D., Matray, J., Bensenouci, F., Gaucher, E. C., Tournassat, C. and Hadi, J.
    [2012] Geochemical characterization and modelling of the Toarcian/Domerian porewater at the Tournemire underground research laboratory. Applied Geochemistry, 27, 1417–1431.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600024
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600024
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error