1887

Abstract

Summary

Despite being applied for nearly three decades now, the seismic methods for deep mineral exploration are routinely carried out using 2D profiles along existing roads requiring crooked-line methods. While the assumption of a 2D geology is rarely valid in most mining environments, no follow up or very little 3D surveys are attempted. Using synthetic seismic data and case studies, we illustrate that 3D seismic surveys should ultimately be carried out for detailed interpretations and for direct targeting of mineralization. We show for example that a bright-spot seismic anomaly observed on a 2D seismic profile was associated with an approximately 6 Mt of massive sulphide mineralization that was targeted, after being delineated on 3D seismic volume, about 500–700 m off the 2D profile at about 1.2 km depth but shallower than that observed in the 2D profile. The mineralization produced a noticeable diffraction signal in the 3D unmigrated volume with certain characteristics providing information about the geometry and possibly the mineralization content. Using another case study we show how sometimes 2D crooked-line data can provide information about accurate delineation of small objects in 3D. Nevertheless we argue that nothing would replace a proper 3D seismic survey and encourage this to be done if exploration to be successful.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600031
2016-03-18
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eaton, D.W., Milkereit, B. and Salisbury, M.
    [2003] Hardrock seismic exploration: mature technologies adapted to new exploration targets, Foreword to Hardrock Seismic Exploration. In: Eaton, D.W., Milkereit, B., Salisbury, M.H. (Eds) Hardrock Seismic Exploration, Tulsa, Oklahoma, SEG, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellefleur, G., Malehmir, A. and Müller, C.
    [2012] Elastic finite-difference modeling of volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits: A case study from Halfmile Lake, New Brunswick, Canada. Geophysics, 77, WC25–WC36.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buske, S., Bellefleur, G. and Malehmir, A.
    [2015] Introduction to Special Issue on “Hard Rock Seismic Imaging”. Geophysical Prospecting, 63, 751–753.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dehghannejad, M., Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C. and Skyttä, P.
    [2012] 3D constraints and finite-difference modeling of massive sulfide deposits: The Kristineberg seismic lines revisited, northern Sweden. Geophysics, 77, WC69–WC79.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Malehmir, A. and Bellefleur, G.
    [2009] 3D seismic reflection imaging of volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits: Insights from re-processing Halfmile Lake data, New Brunswick, Canada. Geophysics, 74, B209–B219.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Malehmir, A., Schmelzbach, C., Bongajum, E., Bellefleur, G., Juhlin, C. and Tryggvason, A.
    [2009] 3D constraints on a possible deep >2.5 km massive sulphide mineralization from 2D crooked-line seismic reflection data in the Kristineberg mining area, northern Sweden. Tectonophysics, 479, 223–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Matthews, L.
    [2002] Base metal exploration: Looking deeper and adding value with seismic data. Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Recorder, 27, 37–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nedimović, M.R. and West, G.F.
    [2003] Crooked-line 2D seismic reflection imaging in crystalline terrains: Part 1, data processing. Geophysics, 68, 274–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Salisbury, M.H., Harvey, C.W. and Matthews, L.
    [2003] The acoustic properties of ores and host rocks in hardrock terranes. In: Milkereit, B., Eaton, D., Salisbury, M. (Eds.) Hardrock Seismic Exploration, SEG, 9–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu, J.
    [1996] Potential pitfalls of crooked-line seismic reflection surveys. Geophysics, 61, 277–81.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600031
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600031
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error