A Comparative Analysis of SP Data Inversion by Spectral, Tomographic and Global Optimization Approaches

References

1. Abdelazeem, M. and Gobashy, M.
   [2006] Self-potential inversion using genetic algorithm, JKAU: Earth Science, 17, 83–101.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abdelrahman, E.M., El-Araby, H.M., Hassaneen, A.G. and Hafez, M.A.
   [2003] New methods for shape and depth determinations from SP data, Geophysics, 68, 1202–1210.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Agarwal, B.N.P. and Srivastava, S.
   [2009] Analyses of self-potential anomalies by conventional and extended Euler deconvolution techniques, Computers & Geosciences, 35, 2231–2238.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biswas, A. and Sharma, S.P.
   [2014] Resolution of multiple sheet-type structures in self-potential measurements, Earth System Science, 123, 809–825.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bresco, M., Raiconi, G., Barone, F., De Rosa, R., Milano, L.
   [2005] Genetic approach helps to speed classical Price algorithm for global optimization, Soft Computing, 9, 525–535.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burg, J.P.
   [1975] Maximum entropy spectral analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, California.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Das, B., and Agarwal, P.B.
   [2012] Depth determination of 2-D SP anomaly source using energy spectrum method and its advantages, Proceedings of 9th SPG Annual meeting, Expanded abstracts.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Di Maio, R. and Patella, D.
   [1994] Self-potential anomaly generation in volcanic areas. The Mt. Etna case history, Acta Vulcanologica, 4, 119–124.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Di Maio, R., Piegari, E., Rani, P. and Avella, A.
   [2016] Self-potential data inversion through the integration of spectral analysis and tomographic approaches, Geophysical Journal International (submitted).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Essa, K.S.
    [2011] A new algorithm for gravity or self-potential data interpretation, Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 8, 434–446.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Göktürkler, G. and Balkaya, Ç.
    [2012] Inversion of self-potential anomalies caused by simple-geometry bodies using global optimization algorithms, Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9, 498–507.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Iuliano, T., Mauriello, P. and Patella, D.
    [2001] A probability tomography approach to the analysis of potential field data in the Campi Flegrei Caldera (Italy), Annals of Geophysics, 44, 403–420.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Patella, D.
    [1997] Introduction to ground surface self-potential tomography, Geophysical Prospecting, 45, 653–681.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Monteiro Santos, F.A.
    [2010] Inversion of self-potential of idealized bodies’ anomalies using particle swarm optimization, Computer & Geosciences, 36, 1185–1190.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Price, W.L.
    [1976] A controlled random search procedure for global optimization, The Computer Journal, 20, 357–370.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rani, P., Di Maio, R. and Piegari, E.
    [2015] High-resolution spectral analysis methods for self-potential data inversion, Proceedings of 85th SEG Annual meeting, Expanded abstracts, 1596–1601.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Spector, A. and Grant, F.S.
    [1970] Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 35, 293–302.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Srivastava, S., Agarwal, B.N.P.
    [2009] Interpretation of self-potential anomalies by enhanced local wavenumber technique, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68, 259–268.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Stoica, P. and Moses, R.L.
    [2005] Spectral Analysis of Signals. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 452 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ulrych, T.J. and Bishop, T.N.
    [1975] Maximum entropy spectral analysis and autoregressive decomposition, Review of Geophysics and Space Physics, 13, 183–200.
    [Google Scholar]