1887

Abstract

Summary

Simultaneous shooting is one of the main levers to increase the cost-effectiveness of seismic data acquisitions - either by decreasing the acquisition time or increasing the shot density. It is then fundamental to design efficient source separation solutions to recover blended data. We address the de-blending problematic in the context of land vibroseismic as its operational models are naturally suited for blended acquisition. In the case of multiple autonomous vibrator trucks, the essential criteria of shooting time randomness is met and at the same time, many constraints encountered with classical acquisition disappear (such as shooting time patterns). Fully unconstrained source acquisitions open the way to unprecedented production rates and shot densities. Simultaneous shooting acquisition can be considered as a case of Compressed Sensing (timely compressed data). Applying concepts and techniques from this field, we design a deblending procedure based on inverse problems in the Curvelet domain. We use a mathematical formulation to address simultaneous source acquisition. The data recovery is based on the search of the sparse code of the "clean" data in the Curvelet domain, through a 11 regularized inverse problem. Our procedure has been successfully used to deblend 3D common receiver gathers from a real blended acquisition.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600947
2016-05-30
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Mahrooqi, S., Rawahi, S., Yarubi, S., S.Abri, A.Y., Hunt, K. and Clow, F.
    [2012] DS3Recording for Faster Seismic Acquisition Rate Without Data Compromise. 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition - Workshops, EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouska, J.
    [2009] Distance separated simultaneous sweeping: Efficient 3 D v ibroseis a cquisition in Oman. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, SEG, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Candes, E.J. and Demanet, L.
    [2005] The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58, 1472–1528.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Candes, E.J., Romberg, J.K. and Tao, T.
    [2006] Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 59, 1207–1223.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Candes, E.J., Wakin, M.B. and Boyd, S.R
    [2008] Enhacing sparsity by reweighted l\ minimization. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications, 877–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Donoho, D.
    [2006] Compressed sensing. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 52(4), 1289–1306.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, C, Mosher, C.C., Morley, L.C., Ji, Y. and Brewer, J.D.
    [2013] Joint source deblending and recon-struction for seismic data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, SEG, 82–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lin, T.T. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2009] Unified compressive sensing framework for simultaneous acquisi-tion with primary estimation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 28, SEG, 3113–3117.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rozemond, H.J.
    [1996] Slip-sweep acquisition. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600947
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201600947
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error