1887

Abstract

Summary

Shallow-seismic Rayleigh and Love waves are attractive for geotechnical site investigations. They exhibit a high signal to noise ratio in field data recordings and have a high sensitivity to the S-wave velocity, an important lithological and geotechnical parameter to characterize the very shallow subsurface. In this work we compare the performance of individual full waveform inversion (FWI) of Rayleigh or Love waves and explore the benefits of a simultaneous joint inversion of both types of surfaces waves. The analysis shows that the true S-wave velocity model could be reconstructed by both the individual waveform inversions and the joint inversion of both wave types. The FWI of Rayleigh waves suffers from artifacts below the source positions. These artifacts also appear in the results of the joint inversion, limiting the resolution of the final S-wave velocity and the final data fit. The individual Love wave FWI does not suffer from source artifacts and thus allows for a smooth convergence and excellent final fit. In our synthetic example the single inversion of Love waves is thus superior to the individual inversion of Rayleigh waves and the joint inversion of Rayleigh and Love waves.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601009
2016-05-30
2024-07-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dokter, E., Köhn, D., Wilken, D. and Rabbel, W.
    [2014] Application of Elastic 2D Waveform Inversion to a Near Surface SH-wave Dataset. In: 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Groos, L., Schäfer, M., Forbriger, T. and Bohlen, T.
    [2014] The role of attenuation in 2D full-waveform inversion of shallow-seismic body and Rayleigh waves. Geophysics, 79(6), R247–R261.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kähler, S. and Meissner, R.
    [1983] Radiation and receiver pattern of shear and compressional waves as a function of Poisson’s ratio. Geophysical Prospecting, 31(3), 421–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Köhn, D.
    [2011] Time domain 2D elastic full waveform tomography. Ph. D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mora, P.
    [1987] Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data. Geophysics, 52(9), 1211–1228.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.
    [2006] Numerical optimization. Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pan, Y., Xia, J., Xu, Y., Gao, L. and Xu, Z.
    [2016] Love-wave waveform inversion in time domain for shallow shear-wave velocity. Geophysics, 81(1), R1–R14.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Plessix, R.E. and Mulder, W.
    [2004] Frequency-domain finite-difference amplitude-preserving migration. Geophysical Journal International, 157(3), 975–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schäfer, M., Groos, L., Forbriger, T. and Bohlen, T.
    [2014] Line-source simulation for shallow-seismic data. Part 2: full-waveform inversion—a synthetic 2-D case study. Geophysical Journal International, 198(3), 1405–1418.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Virieux, J.
    [1984] SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 49(11), 1933–1942.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. [1986] P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity-stress finite-difference method. Geophysics, 51(4), 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601009
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601009
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error