1887

Abstract

Summary

Structural and stratigraphic discontinuities, such as fault and unconformity, usually contribute to the construction of traps and reservoirs. Coherence measurement is an effective tool for representing geological discontinuities in 3D seismic data volumes. Compared with the classical real-valued coherence algorithm, coherence calculation using analytic traces can produce both dip related information and discontinuity measurement. In this paper, we incorporate dip scanning into the multi-trace complex-valued correlation algorithm to detect distribution of discontinuities. The proposed algorithm is computationally efficient, since it only utilizes several time samples. In addition, the algorithm can provide two seismic attributes at once, including correlation modulus defining discontinuity and local phase shift connected with dip of events. The local phase shift attribute further provides an alternative way to derive local dip. As well, the algorithm can suppress low-valued artefacts caused by linear and curving dipping events to highlight discontinuous edges. The applications on both synthetic and real data demonstrate its effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601023
2016-05-31
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bahorich, M. and Farmer, S.
    [1995] 3d seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features: the coherence cube. The Leading Edge, 14(10), 1053–1058.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Browaeys, J.
    [2009] Complex-valued correlation and seismic attributes. 79th SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1053–1057.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2010] Local complex-valued correlation of seismic phases. 80th SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1423–1427.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Claerbout, J. and Fomel, S.
    [2000] Image estimation by example. Geophysical soundings image construction, SEP.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gersztenkorn, A. and Marfurt, K.
    [1999] Eigenstructure-based coherence computations as an aid to 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping. Geophysics, 64(5), 1468–1479.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, R.Y., Liu, J.Z., Yan, B.P., Yuan, SY. and Wang, S.X.
    [2015] Multitrace complex-valued correlation method. 85th SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1749–1753.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Marfurt, K., Kirlin, R., Farmer, S. and Bahorich, M.
    [1998] 3d seismic attributes using a semblance-based coherency algorithm. Geophysics, 63(4), 1150–1165.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Marfurt, K., Sudhakar, V., Gersztenkorn, A., Crawford, K. and Nissen, S.
    [1999] Coherency calculations in the presence of structural dip. Geophysics, 64(1), 104–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Marfurt, K.
    [2006] Robust estimates of 3D reflector dip and azimuth. Geophysics, 71(4), 29–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. O’Doherty, R. and Taner, M.
    [1992] A method of computing instantaneous frequency and dip. 54th EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, 180–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Taner, M.T., Koehler, F. and Sheriff, R.E.
    [1979] Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 44(6), 1041–1063.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601023
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error