1887

Abstract

Summary

A workflow is demonstrated which uses numerical modeling to mechanically quantify the induced seismic potential of a given area as a function of differential stress and shear components. With properly constrained and conditioned geologic and geophysical inputs, a representative fracture model may be simulated to deliver geomechanical outputs which correlate well with seismicity where such information is available. Near Oklahoma City, fault data from recent Oklahoma Geologic Survey publications is simulated using realistic regional stress and rock properties which produce a geomechanical proxy map that clearly outlines regions of high and low stress/shear which demonstrate similar trends to seismicity. This same workflow is applied to the largescale regional faults collected into GIS data by the Alberta Geological Survey. When simulated using realistic regional conditions, certain areas and geometries of fault blocks result in areas of escalated stress/shear even away from the large faults bounding the blocks. The ability of the workflow to realistically capture the mechanical effect of faults at a regional scales, and simulate the interaction of several faults within an evolving stress environment, provides a quantitative measure of the mechanical potential for high pressure injection wells to trigger a large seismic event in a given area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601030
2016-05-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AimeneY., Ouenes, A.
    [2015] Geomechanical modeling of hydraulic fractures interacting with natural fractures — Validation with microseismic and tracer data from the Marcellus and Eagle Ford, Interpretation, 3(3), SU71-SU88. doi: 10.1190/INT‑2014‑0274.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2014-0274.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Umholtz, N. and Ouenes, A.
    [2015] Optimal Fracing Near Faults - Quantifying the Interaction Between Natural and Hydraulic Fractures Using Geomechanical Modeling. Society of Petroleum Engineers, doi: 10.2118/176932‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/176932-MS [Google Scholar]
  3. Nairn, J.
    [2003] Material Point Method Calculations with Explicit Cracks. CMES4(6), 649–663. doi:10.1.1.64.4059
    https://doi.org/10.1.1.64.4059 [Google Scholar]
  4. Scholz, C.
    [2002] The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511818516
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818516 [Google Scholar]
  5. Peliminary Fault Map of Oklahoma, AHolland [2015] http://www.ou.edu/content/ogs/data/fault.html
    [Google Scholar]
  6. USGS Earthquake Archives, ANSS ComCat
    , http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/
  7. Alberta Geologic Survey, Geology of Alberta GIS Data, http://www.ags.gov.ab.ca/gis/download_gis.htm
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601030
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error