1887

Abstract

Summary

We analyze the interevent time distribution of hydraulic-fracturing-induced seismicity collected during 18 stages at four different regions. We identify a universal statistical process describing the distribution of hydraulic-fracturing-induced events in time. The distribution of waiting times between subsequently occurring events is given by the exponential probability density function of the homogeneous Poisson process. Our findings suggest that hydraulic-fracturing-induced seismicity is directly triggered by the relaxation of stress and pore pressure perturbation initially created by the injection. Therefore, compared to this relaxation, the stress transfer caused by the occurrence of preceding seismic events is mainly insignificant for the seismogenesis of subsequently occurring events. We develop a statistical model to compute the occurrence probability of hydraulic-fracturing-induced seismicity. This model can be used to assess the seismic hazard associated with hydraulic fracturing operations. No aftershock triggering has to be included in the statistical model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601153
2016-05-31
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Corral, Á
    . [2006] Dependence of earthquake recurrence times and independence of magnitudes on seismicity history. Tectonophysics, 424(3), 177–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dinske, C. and Shapiro, S.A.
    [2013] Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity. Journal of seismology, 17(1), 13–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hainzl, S., Scherbaum, F. and Beauval, C.
    [2006] Estimating background activity based on intereventtime distribution. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(1), 313–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Langenbruch, C., Dinske, C. and Shapiro, S.
    [2011] Inter event times of fluid induced earthquakes suggest their Poisson nature. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(21).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Massey, F.J., Jr.
    [1951] The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American statistical Association, 46(253), 68–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ogata, Y.
    [1998] Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 50(2), 379–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shapiro, S. and Dinske, C.
    [2009] Scaling of seismicity induced by nonlinear fluid-rock interaction. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), 114(B9).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Shapiro, S.A., Dinske, C., Langenbruch, C. and Wenzel, F.
    [2010] Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations. The Leading Edge, 29(3), 304–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shcherbakov, R., Yakovlev, G., Turcotte, D.L. and Rundle, J.B.
    [2005] Model for the distribution of aftershock interoccurrence times. Physical review letters, 95(21), 218501.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601153
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601153
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error