1887

Abstract

Summary

The paper presents results of mercury injection capillary pressure, nuclear magnetic resonance and gas permeability measurements on samples of Carboniferous sandstones and mudstones from the P-29 well. The well is located in the Variscan zone, in the northern part of the Fore-Sudetic Monocline (western Poland) which represents a prospective area for the occurrence of unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Results of the applied laboratory methods allowed detailed analysis of the pore space geometry and estimation of a number of petrophysical parameters for the analysed Carboniferous rocks. The measurement results build up a picture of rocks with porous type of reservoir space, characterized by the high proportion of micropores and relatively low effective porosity. The insignificant value of permeability (not exceeding 0.1 mD), in combination with the subcapillary nature of the pore space and the large proportion of closed pores, allowed the authors to categorize the analysed samples as potential reservoir rocks for tight gas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601282
2016-05-30
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Botor, D., Papiernik, B., Mackowski, T., Reicher, B., Kosakowski, P., Machowski, G and Gorecki, W.
    [2013] Gas generation in carboniferous source rocks of the variscan foreland basin: implications for a charge history of rotliegend deposits with natural gases. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 83, 353–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Giesche, H.
    [2006] Mercury Porosimetry: A General (Practical) Overview. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 23(1), 9–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rezaee, R., Saeedi, A. and Clennel, B.
    [2012] Tight gas sands permeability estimation from mercury injection capillary pressure and nuclear magnetic resonance data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 88–89, 92–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Weglarz, W., Krzyzak, A. and Stefaniuk, M.
    [2015] ZTE imaging of tight sandstone rocks at 9.4T -comparison with standard NMR analysis at 0.05 T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2015.12.001.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2015.12.001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601282
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601282
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error