1887

Abstract

Summary

A huge and high resolution magnetotelluric investigation was conducted in the Sehqanat oil field, SW of Iran, in 2013 to map geoelectrical structure of the region from surface down to several kilometers. The Sehqanat oil field is located in sedimentary Zagros zone comprising ranges of the biggest oil fields in Iran. The most interesting target in this survey was geological contact between Gachsaran (Cap Rock) and Asmari (Reservoir) formation. According to the electrical logs information, large resistivity contrast exists at the boundary of two mentioned formations. The Gachsaran formation is formed by tens to hundreds meter of evaporites which is highly conductive (ca. 1–10 ohm-m) and the Asmari formation, in contrary, comprising of dense carbonates with more electrical resistivity range (more than 100 ohm-m). The broadband magnetotelluric data were collected in a 3-D pattern at more than 500 stations along five parallel southwest-northeast profiles crossing the main geological trend of the study area. In order to image a comprehensive subsurface resistivity map throughout the Sehqanat oil field, three-dimensional inversion was performed on the magnetotelluric data as well as two-dimensional routine. The 2-D inversion results depicted the main resistivity structures while the 3-D inverted model shows significantly more details and consistency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601311
2016-05-30
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Egbert, G.D., Booker, J.R.
    [1986] Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc, 87, 173–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kalscheuer, T., Garcia, M., Meqbel, N., Pedersen, L.B.
    [2010] Non-linear model error and resolution properties from two-dimensional single and joint inversions of direct current resistivity and radiomagnetotelluric data. Geophys J Int, 182(3), 1174–1188.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kalscheuer, T., Hübert, J., Kuvshinov, A., Lochbuehler, T., Pedersen, L.B.
    [2012] A hybrid regularization scheme for the inversion of magnetotelluric data from natural and controlled sources to layer and distortion parameters. Geophysics, 77(4), 301–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pedersen, L.B., Engels, M.
    [2005] Routine 2–D inversion of magnetotelluric data using the determinant of the impedance tensor. Geophysics, 70, 33–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Siripunvaraporn, W., Egbert, G
    [2000] An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data. Geophysics, 65, 791–803.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Siripunvaraporn, W., Egbert, G, Lenbury, Y., Uyeshima, M.
    [2005] Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion: data-space method. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 150, 3–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Siripunvaraporn, W., Egbert, G
    [2009] WSINV3DMT: Vertical magnetic field transfer function inversion and parallel implementation. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 173, 317–329.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Spratt, J.E., Craven, J., Jones, A.G, Ferri, F., Riddell, J.
    [2006] Utility of magnetotelluric data in unraveling the stratigraphic structural frame work of the Nechako Basin, British Columbia from a re-analysis of 20-year-old data. In: Geological Field work 2006, BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Paper 2007-1 and Geoscience BC, Report 2007-1, p. 395–403.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Strack, K.M., Hoerdt, A., Wolfgram, P.A., Vozoff, K.
    [1991] Integrated electromagnetic and seismic methods for petroleum exploration. Exploration Geophysics, 22, 375–378.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601311
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601311
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error