1887

Abstract

Summary

In this paper, we discuss a comparison of deterministic and geostatistical inversion approaches to reservoir characterization of a complex gas-saturated clastic reservoir with thin coal beds. This reservoir type is characterized by high acoustic contrasts which present challenges for inversion techniques. To overcome these challenges in deterministic inversion, a methodology was applied to update the low frequency model in an iterative manner. This method improves the accuracy of elastic properties prediction which was verified with data from 28 newly drilled wells. Furthermore, it proves that for quantitative reservoir characterization, the application of AVO/AVA geostatistical inversion is recommended.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601337
2016-05-30
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Jarvis, K.
    , [2006]. Integrating well and seismic data for reservoir characterization: risks and rewards. AESC2006, extended abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mesdag, P.R., Marquez, D., de Groot, L., and Aubin, V.
    [2010]. Updating Low frequency Model. 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, extended abstracts, F027
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Sams, M., Saussus, D.
    , [2010]. Comparison of lithology and net pay uncertainty between deterministic and geostatistical inversion workflows. First Break, 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sams, M., Millar, I., Satriawan, W., Saussus, D., and Bhattacharyya, S.
    , [2011]. Integration of geology and geophysics through geostatistical inversion: a case study. First Break, 29.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601337
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601337
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error