1887

Abstract

Summary

It is common knowledge that stacking suppresses uncorrelated noise increasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A coherent signal is summed constructively but random noise cancels out. The SNR on the stack increases with the square root of the number of the stacked traces. Stacking of incoherent signal is less effective and it can reduce the SNR. Incoherency is common for microseismic events due to polarity reversals. In such cases stacking of the absolute values of the traces is used. But the stacking of absolute values is not as effective in noise suppression as stacking positive and negative values. Although it is true in most of the practical cases of low SNR values on individual traces, it is not true in general. We present a synthetic case study, and theoretical analysis, which shows that for some definitions of the SNR this phenomenon appears.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601479
2016-05-31
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chambers, K., Kendall, J.M., Brandsberg-Dahl, S., and Rueda, J.
    [2010] Testing the ability of surface arrays to monitor microseismic activity. Geophysical Prospecting, 58(5), 821–830.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Khaidukov, V., Landa, E., and Moser, T. J.
    [2004] Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69, 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Trojanowski, J. and Eisner, L.
    [2016] Comparison of migration-based location and detection methods for microseismic events. Geophysical Prospecting, (accepted in 2015).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601479
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601479
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error