1887

Abstract

Summary

In this abstract, we demonstrate a target-oriented imaging strategy to estimate the impulse responses from a local target in the subsurface from surface seismic data. The presented strategy is a two-step procedure. The first step is Joint Migration Inversion to estimate the upgoing and downgoing wavefields at a specific subsurface depth level in the vicinity of the local target. The second step is the Proximity Transformation, based on iterative sparse inversion approach, to estimate the impulse responses from a local target. The presented strategy makes use of internal multiples to enhance the illumination at the target level below a complex overburden and to reduce the dependency on source sampling. Here, we have made use of a synthetic data example to show both steps of the method and to demonstrate the importance of incorporating internal multiples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601529
2016-05-30
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J.
    [1982] Seismic migration, imaging of acoustic energy by wave field extrapolation, Part A: theoretical aspects. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2014a] Review paper: An outlook on the future seismic imaging, Part I: forward and reverse modelling. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 911–930.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2014c] Review paper: An outlook on the future seismic imaging, Part III: Joint Migration Inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 950–971.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. da Costa, A., Soni, A.K. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2015] Using mutiples to improve the reservoir response via sparse inversion. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, 2978–2983.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gisolf, A. and van den Berg, P.M.
    [2010] Target-oriented non-linear inversion of time-lapse seismic data. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, 2860–2864.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Knopoff, L. and Gangi, A.F.
    [1959] Seismic reciprocity. Geophysics, 24, 681–691.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. van der Neut, J. and Herrmann, F.J.J.
    [2013] Interferometric redatuming by sparse inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 192, 666–670.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuster, G.T. and Zhou, M.
    [2006] A theoretical overview of model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. Geophysics, 71, SI103–SI110.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Soni, A.K., Staal, X.A. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2012b] VSP imaging using all multiples: Full wavefield migration approach. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, Las Vegas, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wapenaar, K., Cox, H.L.H. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [1992] Elastic redatuming of multicomponent seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 465–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., van der Neut, J., Brogini, F., Slob, E. and Sneider, R.
    [2014] Marchenko Imaging. Geophysics, 79, WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601529
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601529
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error