1887

Abstract

Summary

Time-frequency representation (TFR) can provide local spectral information in seismic data processing. High-quality TFR is important for analyzing these time-varying signals to characterize geological structures. Due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, traditional time-frequency methods (e.g. short time Fourier transform and continuous wavelet transform) always lead to ambiguous TFR which has negative effect on characterization of seismic signal with high resolution. A novel time-frequency representation method called the multitapered synchrosqueezing transform (MSST) is proposed to distinguish the different time-frequency contents. We introduce this promising time-frequency representation method to seismic data processing and show its effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601561
2016-05-30
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chakraborty, A. and Okaya, D.
    [1995] Frequency-time decomposition of seismic data using wavelet-based methods. Geophysics, 60(6), 1906–1916.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DaubechiesI.
    [1988] Time-frequency localization operators: a geometric phase space approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 34(4), 605–612.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Daubechies, I., Lu, J., and Wu, H.
    [2011] Synchrosqueezed wavelet transform: An empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appllied and computational harmonic analysis, 30(2), 243–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Daubechies, I., Wang, Y., and Wu, H.
    [2015] ConceFT: Concentration of Frequency and Time via a multitapered synchrosqueezed transform. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.05366.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gao, J., Chen, W., Li, Y., and Tian, F.
    [2003] Generalized S transform and seismic response analysis of thin interbeds. Chinese Journal of geophysics, 46(4), 526–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Han, J., Herrera, R., and Van der Baan, M.
    [2013] Spectral decomposition by synchrosqueezing transform. 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrera, R., Han, J., and Van der Baan, M.
    [2014] Applications of the synchrosqueezing transform in seismic time-frequency analysis. Geophysics, 79(3), 55–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Morlet, J., Arens, G, Fourgeau, E., and Giard, D.
    [1982] Wave propagation and sampling theory-Part I: Complex signal and scattering in multilayered media. Geophysics, 47(2), 203–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Oberlin, T., Meignen, S., and Perrier, V.
    [2014] The Fourier-based synchrosqueezing transform. IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 315–319.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Partyka, G, Gridley, J., and Lopez, J.
    [1999] Interpretational applications of spectral decomposition in reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge, 18(3), 353–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Stockwell, R., MansinhaL., and LoweR.
    [1996] Localization of the complex spectrum: The S transform. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 44(4), 998–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, P., Gao, J., and Wang, Z.
    [2014] Time-frequency analysis of seismic data using synchrosqueezing transform. IEEE Geoscience and Romote Sensing Letters, 11(12), 2042–2044.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601561
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601561
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error