1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Random noise attenuation is a persistent problem in seismic exploration. There are many methods to attenuate random noise, among which the prediction filtering method is one of the most classical methods. However, prediction method is model-inconsistent and reduces the amplitudes of the signals. To overcome the shortcomings of the prediction method, we propose a novel approach to attenuate random noise in t-x domain through an inversion procedure. In this approach, a prediction error filter (PEF) is calculated from the noisy data. Then we use this filter as a constraint to the seismic data in order to get the denoised data by inversion. Since the PEF is calculated from the noisy data, it should be recalculated from the denoised seismic data. The process of calculating signal, then getting a new PEF should be iterated a few times. Besides, how to select the two trade-off parameters efficiently also has been discussed. Both synthetic and field data examples demonstrate excellent performance of the proposed approach.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601587
2016-05-30
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601587
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abma, R. and J.Claerbout
    . [1995] Lateral prediction for noise attenuation by t-x and f-x techniques. Geophysics, 60, 1887–1896.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Canales, L.
    [1984] Random noise reduction. 54th SEG Annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 525–527.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Gulunay, N.
    [1986] FXDECON and complex Wiener prediction fliter. 56th SEG Annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 279–281.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Hornbostel, S.
    [1991] Spatial prediction filtering in the t-x and f-x domains. Geophysics, 56(12), 2019–2026.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, G. C., Chen, X. H., Du, J. and Wu, K. L.
    [2012] Random noise attenuation using f-x regularized nonstationary autoregression. Geophysics, 77(2), V61–V69.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Y., Liu, N. and Liu, C.
    [2015] Adaptive prediction filtering in t-x-y domain for random noise attenuation using regularized nonstationary autogression. Geophysics, 80(1), V13–V21.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Sacchi, M. and H.Kuehl
    . [2001] ARMA formulation of FX prediction error filters and projection filters. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 9, 185–197.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Soubaras, R.
    [1995] Prestack random and impulsive noise attenuation by f-x projection filtering. 65th SEG Annual meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 711–714.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Yuan, S. Y., Wang, S. X. and Li, G. F.
    [2012] Random noise reduction using Bayesian inversion. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9, 60–68.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601587
Loading
Inversion-based t-x Domain Signal-preserving Random Noise Reduction method
Conference Proceedings 2016, 1 (2016); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201601587
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601587
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601587
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error