Insights on CO2 Migration Based on a Multi-physical Inverse Reservoir Modeling Framework

References

1. Archie, G.E.
   [1942] The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers (Trans AIME), 146, 54–62.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bergmann, P., Diersch, M., Götz, J., Ivandic, M., Ivanova, A., Juhlin, C., Kummerow, J., Liebscher, A., Lüth, S., Meekes, S., Norden, B., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Wagner, F.M. and Zhang, F.
   [2016] Review on geophysical monitoring of CO2 injection at Ketzin, Germany. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 139, 112–136.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Börner, J.H., Herdegen, V., Repke, J.U. and Spitzer, K.
   [2015] The electrical conductivity of CO2-bearing pore waters at elevated pressure and temperature: a laboratory study and its implications in CO2 storage monitoring and leakage detection. Geophysical Journal International, 203(2), 1072–1084.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chadwick, R.A. and Noy, D.J.
   [2015] Underground CO2 storage: demonstrating regulatory conformance by convergence of history-matched modeled and observed CO 2 plume behavior using Sleipner time-lapse seismics. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 5(3), 305–322.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Doetsch, J., Kowalsky, M.B., Doughty, C., Finsterle, S., Ajo-Franklin, J.B., Carrigan, C.R., Yang, X., Hovorka, S.D. and Daley, T.M.
   [2013] Constraining CO2 simulations by coupled modeling and inversion of electrical resistance and gas composition data. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 18, 510–522.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kempka, T. and Kühn, M.
   [2013] Numerical simulations of CO2 arrival times and reservoir pressure coincide with observations from the Ketzin pilot site, Germany. Environmental Earth Sciences, 70(8), 3675–3685.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Kummerow, J. and Spangenberg, E.
   [2011] Experimental evaluation of the impact of the interactions of CO2-SO2, brine, and reservoir rock on petrophysical properties: A case study from the Ketzin test site, Germany. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12, Q05010.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Liebscher, A., Möller, F., Bannach, A., Köhler, S., Wiebach, J., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Weiner, M., Pretschner, C., Ebert, K. and Zemke, J.
   [2013] Injection operation and operational pressure-temperature monitoring at the CO2 storage pilot site Ketzin, Germany - Design, results, recommendations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 15, 163–173.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lüth, S., Ivanova, A. and Kempka, T.
   [2015] Conformity assessment of monitoring and simulation of CO2 storage: A case study from the Ketzin pilot site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 42, 329–339.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Norden, B. and Frykman, P.
    [2013] Geological modelling of the Triassic Stuttgart Formation at the Ketzin CO2 storage site, Germany. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 19, 756 – 774.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Oliver, D.S. and Chen, Y.
    [2010] Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Computational Geosciences, 15(1), 185–221.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Wiese, B., Nimtz, M., Möller, F., Otto, C., Kühn, M., Liebscher, A. and Schmidt-Hattenberger, C.
    [2012] Determination of thermodynamics in a CO2 injection well using pressure and distributed temperature sensing. IAHS Redbook, 355, 286–290.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Zimmer, M., Erzinger, J. and Kujawa, C.
    [2011] The gas membrane sensor (GMS): A new method for gas measurements in deep boreholes applied at the CO2SINK site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(4), 995–1001.
    [Google Scholar]