1887

Abstract

Summary

CO2 capture and storage (CCS) is an important part of the global solution for greenhouse gas control and was first implemented at an industrial scale at the Sleipner project in Norway in 1996. After reviewing the current state of progress with CCS projects, globally, we conclude that CCS is essential to achieving the 2oC warming scenario as stated in the Paris agreement. Industrial-scale CCS projects in Norway have been important vehicles for developing and demonstrating the many technologies involved in CCS. By reviewing this experience we identify key learnings and insights concerning: CO2 storage operations, testing of CO2 capture technologies, the value of geophysical imaging and monitoring data, and insights into storage capacity and injectivity performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601661
2016-05-30
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersson, V., Wittmeyer, K., Gorset, O., Maree, Y. and Sanden, K.
    , 2013. Operational experience and initial results from the first test period at CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad. Energy Procedia, 37, pp. 6348–6356.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baklid, A., Korbol, R. and Owren, G.
    , 1996, January. Sleipner Vest CO2 disposal, CO2 injection into a shallow underground aquifer. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavanagh, A., Haszeldine, R.S. & Nazarian, B.
    , 2015. The Sleipner CO2 storage site: using a basin model to understand reservoir simulations of plume dynamics. First Break, 33(6), 61–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chadwick, A., Williams, G., Delepine, N., Clochard, V., Labat, K., Sturton, S., … & Arts, R.
    2010. Quantitative analysis of time-lapse seismic monitoring data at the Sleipner CO 2 storage operation. The Leading Edge, 29(2), 170–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de Koeijer, G., Enge, Y., Sanden, K., Graff, O.F., Falk-Pedersen, O., Amundsen, T. and Overå, S.,
    2011. CO 2 Technology Centre Mongstad-Design, functionality and emissions of the amine plant. Energy Procedia, 4, pp. 1207–1213.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. GCCSI
    GCCSI2014. The Global Status of CCS: 2014.http://www.globalccsinstitute.com.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. GozalpourF. RenS.R. & TohidiB.
    2005. CO2 EOR and storage in oil reservoir. Oil & gas science and technology, 60(3), 537–546.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Idem, R., Supap, T., Shi, H., Gelowitz, D., Ball, M., Campbell, C. and Tontiwachwuthikul, P.
    , 2015. Practical experience in post-combustion CO2 capture using reactive solvents in large pilot and demonstration plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, pp. 6–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. IPCC
    IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R.Pichs-Madruga, Y.Sokona, E.Farahani, S.Kadner, K.Seyboth, A.Adler, I.Baum, S.Brunner, P.Eickemeier, B.Kriemann, J.Savolainen, S.Schlömer, C. vonStechow, T.Zwickel and J.C.Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Finley, R.J.
    2014. An overview of the Illinois Basin–Decatur project. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 4(5), 571–579.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Furre, A-K, Kiær, A. and Eiken, O.
    2015. CO2-induced seismic time shifts at Sleipner. Interpretation3. 3 (2015): SS23–SS35.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eiken, O., Ringrose, P., Hermanrud, C., Nazarian, B., Torp, T. A., & Høier, L.
    2011. Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snøhvit. Energy Procedia, 4, 5541–5548.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansen, O., Gilding, D., Nazarian, B., Osdal, B., Ringrose, P., Kristoffersen, J. B., … & Hansen, H.
    2013. Snøhvit: the history of injecting and storing 1 Mt CO 2 in the Fluvial Tubåen Fm. Energy Procedia, 37, 3565–3573.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Osdal, B., Zadeh, H.M., Johansen, S., Gonzalez, R.R., Wærum, G.O.
    , 2014. Snøhvit CO2 Monitoring Using Well Pressure Measurement and 4D Seismic. In Fourth EAGE CO2 Geological Storage Workshop, 10.3997/2214‑4609.20140110.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20140110 [Google Scholar]
  15. Pawar, R. J., Bromhal, G. S., Carey, J. W., Foxall, W., Korre, A., Ringrose, P. S., … & White, J. A.
    2015. Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO2 storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 292–311.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh, V.P., Cavanagh, A., Hansen, H., Nazarian, B., Iding, M. and Ringrose, P.S.
    , 2010, January. Reservoir modeling of CO2 plume behavior calibrated against monitoring data from Sleipner, Norway. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE-134891).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Whittaker, S., Rostron, B., Hawkes, C., Gardner, C., White, D., Johnson, J., Chalaturnyk, R. and Seeburger, D.
    2011. A decade of CO2 injection into depleting oil fields: monitoring and research activities of the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO 2 Monitoring and Storage Project. Energy Procedia, 4, pp. 6069–6076.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601661
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201601661
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error