1887

Abstract

Summary

Viscous fingering is a major obstacle to successful waterflooding in heavy oil reservoirs, as it results in premature water breakthrough resulting in bypassed oil and an underdeveloped oil bank ahead. To reduce viscous fingering, the composition of injected fluid needs to be tailored to create a favorable mobility ratio with the oil to be displaced. Smart waterflooding often entails wettability alteration in the reservoir, and it can also lead to a change in mobility ratio, which depending on the value, may have either a negative or positive impact on oil recovery.

This study is an extended study from because in that paper only one static realization was analyzed. This practice may lead to a bias and unreliable result because we did not include the uncertainties into the system. Therefore, a statistical analysis is used to reveal the smart waterflooding true potential. In this study, smart waterflooding outperforms conventional waterflooding regarding oil recovery, with incremental recovery reaching as high as five percent. Moreover, smart waterflooding also significantly decelerates the water cut (WCUT) trend by subduing the effect of viscous fingering and decreasing the water relative permeability.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700252
2017-04-24
2020-09-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Awolayo, A., Sarma, H., & Nghiem, L.
    (2017). A Comprehensive Geochemical-based Approach at Modeling and Interpreting Brine Dilution in Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, 20–22 February 2017. Montgomery, TX, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bethke, C.
    (2006). GWB Essentials Guide. Illinois, USA: University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dang, C.
    (2015). Mechanistic Modeling, Design, and Optimization of Low Salinity Waterflooding. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GEM
    . (2015). GEM User Guide - Version 2015. Computer Modelling Group (CMG), 691.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamon, G.
    (2016). Low-Salinity Waterflooding: Facts, Inconsistencies and the Way Forward. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jerauld, G., Lin, C., Webb, K., & Seccombe, J.
    (2008). Modeling Low Salinity Waterflooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 11(6):1000–1012.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kadeethum, T.
    (2016). Understanding Uncertainties Using Performance Predictive Models for Smart Waterflooding. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: M.Sc. thesis, University of Calgary.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kadeethum, T., Sarma, H., & Maini, B.
    (2017a). Overcome Viscous Fingering Effect in Heavy Oil Reservoirs by an Optimized Smart Water Injection Scheme. Presented at SPE Canada Heavy Oil Conference, 15 – 16 Feb. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2017b). A Novel Residual Oil Saturation and End Point Water Relative Permeability Prediction Model for Smart Waterflood Using a Stepwise Multivariable Regression Technique. Presented at SPE Latin America and Caribbean Mature Fields Symposium, 15–16 March 2017. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Korrani, A. K.
    (2014). Mechanistic Modeling of Low Salinity Water Injection. Austin, Texas, USA: Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kozaki, C.
    (2012). Efficiency of Low Salinity Polymer Flooding in Sandstone Cores. In M.Sc. thesis. University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lager, A., Webb, K., Black, C., Singleton, M., & Sorbie, K.
    (2008). Low-Salinity Oil Recovery – An Experimental Investigation. Petrophysics, 49(1):28–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Levine, D., Ramsey, P., & Smidt, R.
    (2001). Applied Statistics for Engineering and Scientists. Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Loahardjo, N., Xie, X., & Morrow, N.
    (2010). Oil Recovery by Sequential Waterflooding of Mixed-Wet Sandstone and Limestone. Energy & Fuels, 24(9):5073–5080.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McCain, W., & McCain, W. J.
    (1990). The Properties of Petroleum Fluids, second edition. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWell Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Morrow, N., Tang, G., Valat, M., & Xie, X.
    (1998). Prospects of Improved Oil Recovery Related to Wettability and Brine Composition. Journal of Petroleum and Engineering, 20(3–4):267–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Morrow, N., Valat, M., & Yidliz, H.
    (1996). Effect of Brine Composition On Recovery of an Alaskan Crude Oil By Waterflooding. Presented at Annual Technical Meeting, June 10 – 12. Calgary, Alterta: Petroleum Society of Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Petrowiki
    . (2016). PetroWiki - Heavy oil. (Society of Petroleum Engineers) Retrieved from http://petrowiki.org/Heavy_oil
  19. Rivet, S., Lake, L., & Pope, G.
    (2010). A Coreflood Investigation of Low Salinity Enhanced Oil Recovery. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 19–22 September. Florence, Italy: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Shalabi, E. W.
    (2014). Modeling the Effect of Injecting Low Salinity Water on Oil Recovery. Austin, Texas, USA: Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tang, G., & Morrow, N.
    (1997). Salinity, Temperature, Oil Composition and Oil Recovery by Waterflooding. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12(4):269–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Timur, A.
    (1968). An Investigation Of Permeability, Porosity, & Residual Water Saturation Relationships For Sandstone Reservoirs. The Log Analyst, 9(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Willhite, G.
    (1986). WATERFLOODING SPE TEXTBOOK SERIES VOL. 3. Society of Petroleum Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Winoto, W., Loahardjo, N., Xie, S. X., Yin, P., & Morrow, N. R.
    (2012). Secondary and Tertiary Recovery of Crude Oil from Outcrop and Reservoir Rocks by Low Salinity Waterflooding. Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 14–18 April. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:doi:10.2118/154209‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/154209-MS [Google Scholar]
  25. Xie, Q., Ma, D., Wu, J., Liu, Q., Jia, N., & Luo, M.
    (2015a). Low Salinity Waterflooding in Low Permeability Sandstone: Coreflood Experiments and Interpretation by Thermodynamics and Simulation. Presented at SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, 11–13 August. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:doi: 10.2118/174592‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/174592-MS [Google Scholar]
  26. Zeinijahromi, A., & Bedrikovetsky, P.
    (2014, February 26). Enhanced Waterflooding Sweep Efficiency by Induced Formation Damage in Layer-Cake Reservoirs. Presented at SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 26–28 February. Lafayette, Louisiana, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/168203‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/168203-MS [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Y., & Morrow, N.
    (2006). Comparison of Secondary and Tertiary Recovery with Change in Injection Brine Composition for Crude Oil/ Sandstone Combinations. Presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Tulsa, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, Y., Xie, X., & Morrow, N.
    (2007). Waterflood Performance by Injection of Brine with Different Salinity for Reservoir Cores. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 11–14 November. Anaheim, CA, USA: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700252
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700252
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error