1887

Abstract

Summary

When injected at high flow rates in porous medium, polymer solutions exhibit a resistance to flow which is a signature of chain conformation and size. For biopolymers, which exist in solution as rigid rods, mobility reduction follows the shear thinning behavior measured in shear flow on a rheometer. For flexible coils, such as hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, flow thickening is observed in porous medium whereas bulk viscosity presents a shear thinning behavior. These differences are the result of the complex flow experienced in the porous medium combined with the visco-elastic properties at large strains of the solutions.

In this study, we investigate the effect of physical chemistry parameters such as salinity, polymer concentration, molecular weight and degradation state on the mobility reduction in porous medium at high flow rates. We show that parameters describing the mobility reduction curve (flow rates corresponding to the onset and to the maximum of the mobility reduction curves, value of the maximum mobility reduction) are not correlated with bulk viscosity but rather with screen factor. This old and rough measurement, widely used in the EOR community to evaluate “solution elasticity”, is an indirect measurement of the extensional viscosity of polymer solutions. The pertinence and the physical meaning of this measurement is assessed through comparison with measurements performed on a newly developed extensional viscometer, which consists in measuring the pressure drop when the fluid is injected through a hyperbolic contraction (in which strain rate is constant at the centerline). A correlation “Screen factor” vs. “Extensional Viscosity” is obtained. Hence, from the knowledge of the mobility reduction curve in one porous medium in one set of conditions, it is possible to predict the mobility reduction in any other set of conditions from ex-situ measurements of screen factor or extensional viscosity. At last, the inadequacy of traditional small strain visco-elastic measurements to characterize the elastic behavior of polymer solutions at large strain is discussed.

These results give some insight on the behavior of polymer solutions in injectivity conditions along with the way to characterize their elastic properties from bulk measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700330
2017-04-24
2021-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. API, R. P.
    63 (1990), Recommended Practices for Evaluation of Polymers Used in Enhanced Oil Recovery Operations. Washington, DC: API, 63.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chauveteau, G.
    (1981), Molecular interpretation of several different properties of flow of coiled polymer solutions through porous media in oil recovery conditions. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow, A., Keller, A., Müller, A. J., Odell, J. A.
    (1988), Entanglements in polymer solutions under elongational flow: a combined study of chain stretching, flow velocimetry and elongational viscosity, Macromolecules, 21(1), 250–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke, A., Howe, A. M., Mitchell, J., Staniland, J., Hawkes, L. A.
    (2015), How viscoelastic-polymer flooding enhances displacement efficiency, SPE Journal.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clasen, C., Plog, J. P., Kulicke, W. M., Owens, M., Macosko, C., Scriven, L. E., McKinley, G. H.
    (2006), How dilute are dilute solutions in extensional flows?, Journal of Rheology, 50(6), 849–881.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Colby, R. H.
    (2010), Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions, Rheologica Acta, 49(5), 425–442.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Gennes, P. G.
    , (1974), Coil-stretch transition of dilute flexible polymers under ultrahigh velocity gradients, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 60(12), 5030–5042.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Delshad, M., Kim, D. H., Magbagbeola, O. A., Huh, C., Pope, G. A., Tarahhom, F.
    (2008), Mechanistic interpretation and utilization of viscoelastic behavior of polymer solutions for improved polymer-flood efficiency. In SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dupas, A., Henaut, I., Argillier, J.-F., Aubry, T.
    , 2012, Mechanical degradation onset of polyethylene oxide used as a hydrosoluble model polymer for enhanced oil recovery, Oil & Gas Science and Technology, 67(6), 931–940.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Durst, F. R., Haas, R., Kaczmar, B. U.
    (1981), Flows of dilute hydrolyzed polyacrylamide solutions in porous media under various solvent conditions, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 26(9), 3125–3149.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Galindo-Rosales, F. J., Rubio-Hernandez, F. J., Sevilla, A., Ewoldt, R. H.
    (2011a), How Dr. Malcom M. Cross may have tackled the development of “An apparent viscosity function for shear thickening fluids”, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 166(23), 1421–1424.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2011b), How Dr. Malcom M. Cross may have tackled the development of “An apparent viscosity function for shear thickening fluids”, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 166(23), 1421–1424.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Galindo-Rosales, F. J., Alves, M. A., & Oliveira, M. S. N.
    (2013), Microdevices for extensional rheometry of low viscosity elastic liquids: a review, Microfluidics and nanofluidics, 14(1–2), 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Graessley, W. W.
    (2008), Polymeric liquids and networks: dynamics and rheology, Garland Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1980). Polymer chain dimensions and the dependence of viscoelastic properties on concentration, molecular weight and solvent power, Polymer, 21(3), 258–262.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haas, R., & Durst, F.
    (1982), Die Charakterisierung viskoelastischer Fluide mit Hilfe ihrer Strömungseigenschaften in Kugelschüttungen, Rheologica Acta, 21(2), 150–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hincapie, R. E., Duffy, J., O’Grady, C., Ganzer, L.
    (2015), An Approach To Determine Polymer Viscoelasticity Under Flow Through Porous Media by Combining Complementary Rheological Techniques. In SPE Asia Pacific Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Howe, A. M., Clarke, A., Giernalczyk, D.
    (2015), Flow of concentrated viscoelastic polymer solutions in porous media: effect of MW and concentration on elastic turbulence onset in various geometries, Soft Matter, 11(32), 6419–6431.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Huh, C., Pope, G. A.
    (2008), Residual oil saturation from polymer floods: laboratory measurements and theoretical interpretation, In SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. James, D. F.
    (2016), N1 stresses in extensional flows, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 232, 33–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. James, D. F., McLaren, D. R.
    (1975), The laminar flow of dilute polymer solutions through porous media, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 70(04), 733–752.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein, J., Conrad, K. D.
    (1980), Characterisation of poly(acrylamide) in solution, Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 181(1), 227–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Koh, H., Lee, V. B., Pope, G. A.
    (2016), Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Polymers on Residual Oil Saturation, In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kulicke, W. M., Haas, R.
    (1984), Flow behavior of dilute polyacrylamide solutions through porous media. 1. Influence of chain length, concentration, and thermodynamic quality of the solvent, Industrial & engineering chemistry fundamentals, 23(3), 308–315.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lim, T., Uhl, J. T., Prud’homme, R. K.
    (1986), The interpretation of screen-factor measurements, SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1(03), 272–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Levitt, D., Jouenne, S., Bondino, I., Santanach-Carreras, E., & Bourrel, M.
    (2013), Polymer flooding of heavy oil under adverse mobility conditions, In SPE enhanced oil recovery conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McCarthy, K. J., Burkhardt, C. W., Parazak, D. P.
    (1987), Mark–Houwink–Sakurada constants and dilute solution behavior of heterodisperse poly (acrylamide-co-sodium acrylate) in 0.5 M and 1M NaCl. Journal of applied polymer science, 33(5), 1699–1714.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Müller, A. J., Odell, J. A., Carrington, S.
    (1992), Degradation of semidilute polymer solutions in elongational flows, Polymer, 33(12), 2598–2604.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nghe, P., Tabeling, P., Ajdari, A.
    , 2010, Flow induced polymer degradation probed by a high throughput microfluidic set-up, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 165(7–8), 313–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Odell, J. A., Keller, A.
    , 1986, Flow-induced chain fracture of isolated linear macromolecules in solution, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 24(9), 1889–1916.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Odell, J. A., Müller, A. J., Keller, A.
    (1988), Non-Newtonian behaviour of hydrolysed polyacrylamide in strong elongational flows: a transient network approach. Polymer, 29(7), 1179–1190.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ober, T. J., Haward, S. J., Pipe, C. J., Soulages, J., McKinley, G. H.
    (2013), Microfluidic extensional rheometry using a hyperbolic contraction geometry. Rheologica Acta, 52(6), 529–546.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Qi, P., Ehrenfried, D. H., Koh, H., Balhoff, M. T.
    (2016), Reduction of Residual Oil Saturation in Sandstone Cores by Use of Viscoelastic Polymers, SPE Journal.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodriguez, S., Romero, C., Sargenti, M. L., Müller, A. J., Sáez, A. E., Odell, J. A.
    (1993), Flow of polymer solutions through porous media. Journal of non-newtonian fluid mechanics, 49(1), 63–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Seright, R. S., Seheult, J. M., Talashek, T.
    (2009), Injectivity Characteristics of EOR Polymers, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 12(05), 783–792.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Seright, R. S., Fan, T., Wavrik, K., Balaban, R. D. C.
    (2011), New insights into polymer rheology in porous media, SPE Journal, 16(01), 35–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Spildo, K., Sæ, E. I.
    (2015), Effect of Charge Distribution on the Viscosity and Viscoelastic Properties of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide, Energy & Fuels, 29(9), 5609–5617.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Veerabhadrappa, S. K., Doda, A., Trivedi, J. J., Kuru, E.
    (2013), On the effect of polymer elasticity on secondary and tertiary oil recovery, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(51), 18421–18428.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vermolen, E. C. M., Van Haasterecht, M. J. T., Masalmeh, S. K.
    (2014), A systematic study of the polymer visco-elastic effect on residual oil saturation by core flooding, In SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, D., Cheng, J., Yang, Q., Wenchao, G., Qun, L., Chen, F.
    (2000), Viscous-elastic polymer can increase microscale displacement efficiency in cores, In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, D., Xia, H., Yang, S., Wang, G.
    (2010), The Influence of Visco-elasticity on Micro Forces and Displacement Efficiency in Pores, Cores and in the field, In SPE EOR Conference at Oil & Gas West Asia. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700330
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700330
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error