1887

Abstract

Summary

Foam is used in gas-injection EOR processes to reduce the mobility of gas, resulting in greater volumetric sweep. SAG (Surfactant Alternating Gas) is a preferred method of injection as it results in greater injectivity in the field, but designing a successful process requires knowledge of foaming performance at very high foam qualities (gas fractional flows).

Here the use of foam in low-permeability (~1 mD) Indiana Limestone cores for SAG foam applications is studied. Coreflood experiments were performed for a range of foam qualities at high pressure (100 bar), elevated temperature (55°C), high salinity (200,000 ppm) and in the presence of crude oil. The effectiveness of the foam was studied by differential pressure measurements along the core. Foam was still able to form under these stringent conditions, but it was a relatively weak foam (i.e. its ability to reduce gas mobility is modest).

For one surfactant formulation, further analysis of the experimental results show that the foam would be able to maintain mobility control over the displaced phase, thus providing a stable displacement front, and that it can be used in a SAG foam process in these formations. For a second formulation the non-monotonic nature of the fractionalflow data require further investigation before scale-up to the field.

In addition, further coreflood experiments were carried out using heterogeneous, vuggy Edwards White cores with even lower permeability (~0.5 mD). These experiments were performed to determine whether foaming is possible in heterogeneous media and especially to investigate the effects of disconnected vugs on the foaming performance. CT scans were taken during the period of foam injection to determine saturation profiles within the core. Foam was able to form inside these cores, but inside the vugs foam segregation was observed with liquid pockets visible in the bottom of the vugs and gas in the remainder. This segregation was only a local effect though, confined to the vug itself, and foam was able to persist in the rest of the core.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700337
2017-04-24
2021-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alvarez, J. M., Rivas, H. J. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2001] Unified Model for Steady-State Foam Behavior at High and Low Foam Qualities. SPE Journal6(3), 325–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernard, G. G. and Holm, L. W.
    [1964] Effect of Foam on Permeability of Porous Media to Gas. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal4, 267–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boeije, C. S. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2015] Fitting Foam-Simulation-Model Parameters to Data: I. Coinjection of Gas and Liquid. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering Vol. 18 (02)(SPE 174544), pp. 264 – 272–272.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2015] Gas-Injection Rate Needed for SAG Foam Processes To Overcome Gravity Override. SPE Journal Vol. 20 (01), pp. 49 – 59–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boeije, C. S., Vad Bennetzen, M. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2015] A Methodology for Screening Surfactants for Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery in an Oil-Wet Reservoir. International Petroleum Technology Conference (15IPTC-49).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Computer Modeling Group
    . [2006] STARS User’s Guide. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ehrenberg, S. N. and Nadeau, P. H.
    [2005] Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships. AAPG Bulletin89, 435–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ettinger, R. A. and Radke, C. J.
    [1992] Influence of Texture on Steady Foam Flow in Berea Sandstone. SPE Reservoir Engineering7(01), 83–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Falls, A. H., Hirasaki, G. J., Patzek, T. W., Gauglitz, D. A., Miller, D. D. and Ratulowski, J.
    [1988] Development of a Mechanistic Foam Simulator: The Population Balance and Generation by Snap-Off. SPE Reservoir Engineering3, 884–892.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Farajzadeh, R., A. E. A., Kahrobaei, S., Hajibeygi, H., Van der Meer, J. M., Vincent-Bonnieu, S. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2016] Simulation of Instabilities and Fingering in Surfactant Alternating Gas (SAG) Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernø, M. A., Eide, Ø., Steinsbo, M., Langlo, S. A. W., Christophersen, A., Skibenes, A., Ydstebo, T. and Graue, A.
    [2015] Mobility control during CO2 EOR in fractured carbonates using foam: Laboratory evaluation and numerical simulations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering135, 442–451.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kapetas, L., Bonnieu, S. V., Danelis, S., Rossen, W. R., Farajzadeh, R., Eftekhari, A. A., Shafian, S. R. M. and Bahrim, R. Z. K.
    [2016] Effect of temperature on foam flow in porous media. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry36, 229–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kestin, J., Sokolov, M. and Wakeham, W. A.
    [1978] Viscosity of Liquid Water in the Range -8 degC to 150 degC. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data7(3), 941–948.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Khatib, Z. I., Hirasaki, G. J. and Falls, A. H.
    [1988] Effects of Capillary Pressure on Coalescence and Phase Mobilities in Foams Flowing through Porous Media. SPE Reservoir Engineering3, 919–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kibodeaux, K. R. and Rossen, W. R.
    [1997] Coreflood Study of Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Processes: Implications for Field Design. SPE Western Regional Meeting (SPE 38318).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lake, L. W., Johns, R. T., Pope, G. A. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2014] Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma, K., Lopez-Salinas, J. L., Puerto, M. C., Miller, C. A., Biswal, S. L. and Hirasaki, G. J.
    [2013] Estimation of Parameters for the Simulation of Foam Flow through Porous Media. Part 1 : The Dry-Out Effect. Energy & Fuels27(5), 2363–2375.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mohamed, I. M. and Nasr-El-Din, H. A.
    [2012] Formation Damage Due to CO2 Sequestration in Deep Saline Carbonate Aquifers. SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control (SPE 151142).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Moradi-Araghi, A., Johnston, E. L., Zomes, D. R. and Harpole, K. J.
    [1997] Laboratory Evaluation of Surfactants for CO2-Foam Applications at the South Cowden Unit. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry (SPE 37218).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rangel-German, E., Akin, S. and Castanier, L.
    [1999] Multiphase-Flow Properties of Fractured Porous Media. SPE Western Regional Meeting (SPE 54591).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ransohoff, T. C. and Radke, C. J.
    [1988] Mechanisms of Foam Generation in Glass-Bead Packs. SPE Reservoir Engineering3, 573–585.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rossen, W. R.
    [1996] Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery. in R. K.Prud’homme and S.Khan, ed., Foams: Theory, Measurements and Applications, R. K.Prud’homme and S.Khan (eds.), 413–464. Marcel Dekker, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rossen, W. R. and Boeije, C. S.
    [2015] Fitting Foam-Simulation-Model Parameters to Data: II. Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Applications. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering Vol. 18 (02), pp. 273 – 283–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rossen, W. R. and Bruining, J.
    [2007] Foam Displacements With Multiple Steady States. SPE Journal12, 5–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Schramm, L. L.
    [1994] Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shan, D. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2004] Optimal Injection Strategies for Foam IOR. SPE Journal9(2), 132–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Szlendak, S. M., Nguyen, N. and Nguyen, Q. P.
    [2012] Successful Laboratory Investigation of Low-Tension-Gas (LTG) Flooding for Tertiary Oil Recovery in Tight Formations (~10mD to Gas). SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (SPE 159841).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wassmuth, F. R., Green, K. A. and Randall, L.
    [2001] Details of In-Situ Foam Propagation Exposed With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering4, 135–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, Q. and Rossen, W. R.
    [2004] Experimental Study of Gas Injection in Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Process. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering7, 438–448.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700337
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700337
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error