1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. IOR 2017 - 19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Gas injection was introduced to the petroleum industry in the early 1950s. Nevertheless, the process efficiency is impacted by the low density and viscosity of the gas, which decrease sweep efficiency. Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) can overcome the downside of the viscous fingering by increasing the apparent viscosity of the gas. Importantly, the structure of the foam evolves with time due to gas diffusion between bubbles (coarsening). In a bulk foam, the coarsening behaviour is well defined, but there is a lack of understanding of coarsening behaviour in confined geometries, especially in porous media. predicted numerically and analytically that coarsening will cause the foam lamellae to move to low energy configurations in the pore throats, resulting in greater capillary resistance when trying to restart flow.

This study describes foam coarsening in a porous medium and the implications for foam propagation. Foam coarsening experiments have been conducted in both a micromodel and in a rock core. The micromodel is etched with an irregular hexagonal pattern, with a Gaussian distribution of pore diameters. Foam was generated by coinjecting surfactant solution and nitrogen gas into the micromodel. Once steady state flow had been achieved, the flow was stopped. The coarsening behaviour of the foam was recorded using time-lapse photography. The core flood coarsening experiments were carried out using a Bentheimer Sandstone core. Foam was produced by coinjecting surfactant solution and nitrogen at the base of the core. Once a steady state flow was achieved, the flow was stopped and the core sealed off. When flow restarted, the additional driving pressure required to reinitiate flow was measured, and this could be attributed to the stable configuration of the coarsened foam.

The microfluidic results found that the bubbles coarsened rapidly (t < 10 minutes) to the size of the pores. At the completion of coarsening the majority of the lamellae were located in the pore throats with minimum length. Because of the effect of the walls, the behaviour did not conform to the unconstricted coarsening growth laws. Furthermore, results on coreflood showed that coarsening is a rapid process, in agreement with microfluidic results. An increase in the additional pressure required to re-initiate flow was observed for the first 1 – 5 minutes of flow stoppages, while the pressure peaks did not increase for durations above 5 min. The implications of this behaviour for the field scale are also discussed.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700364
2017-04-24
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700364
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cohen, D., Patzek, T. and Radke, C.
    [1996] Two-dimensional network simulation of diffusion-driven coarsening of foam inside a porous medium. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science373, 357–373.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Géraud, B., Jones, S.A., Cantat, I., Dollet, B. and Méheust, Y.
    [2016] The flow of a foam in a two-dimensional porous medium. Water Resources Research52, 773–790.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Glazier, J.A., Gross, S.P. and Stavans, J.
    [1987] Dynamics of two-dimensional soap froths. Physical Review A36, 306–312.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Hilgenfeldt, S., Koehler, S.A. and Stone, H.A.
    [2001]. Dynamics of coarsening foams: Accelerated and self-limiting drainage. Physical Review Letters86, 4704–4707.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones, S.A., van der Bent, V., Farajzadeh, R., Rossen, W.R. and Vincent-Bonnieu, S.
    [2016] Surfactant screening for foam EOR: Correlation between bulk and core-flood experiments. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects500, 166–176.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Lambert, J., Mokso, R., Cantat, I., Cloetens, P., Glazier, J.A., Graner, F. and Delannay, R.
    [2010] Coarsening foams robustly reach a self-similar growth regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 248304.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma, K., Liontas, R., Conn, C.A., Hirasaki, G.J. and Biswal, S.L.
    [2012] Visualization of improved sweep with foam in heterogeneous porous media using microfluidics. Soft Matter8, 10669–10675.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Manlowe, D. and Radke, C.
    [1990] A pore-level investigation of foam / oil interactions in porous media. SPE Reservoir Engineering5, 495–502.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Marchalot, J., Lambert, J., Cantat, I., Tabeling, P. and Jullien, M.-C.
    [2008] 2D foam coarsening in a microfluidic system. EPL83, 64006.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Nonnekes, L.E., Cox, S.J. and Rossen, W.R.
    [2014] Effect of gas diffusion on mobility of foam for enhanced oil recovery. Transport in Porous Media106, 669–689.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Peksa, A.E., Wolf, K.H.A. and Zitha, P. L.
    [2015] Bentheimer sandstone revisited for experimental purposes. Marine and Petroleum Geology67, 701–719.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Rasband, W.S.
    [1997–2016] ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Robin, M., Behot, J. and Sygouni, V.
    [2012]. CO2 injection in porous media : Observations in glass micromodels under reservoir conditions. Proceedings of SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium2, 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Romero-Zeron, L. and Kantzas, A.
    [2005] Pore-scale visualization of foamed gel propagation and trapping in a pore network micromodel. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology44, 44–50
     [Google Scholar]
  15. [2006] Evolution of foamed gel confined in pore network models. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology45, 51–62
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Stavans, J.
    [1990] Temporal evolution of two-dimensional drained soap froths. Phys. Rev. A42, 5049–5051.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. [1993] The evolution of cellular structures. Reports on Progress in Physics56, 733–789.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Stevenson, P.
    (Ed.). [2012]. Foam engineering: Fundamentals and applications. John Wiley and Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Von Neumann, J.
    [1952] Metal interfaces. American Society for Metals, Cleveland, 108–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Weaire, D. and Hutzler, S.
    [1999] The Physics of Foams. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700364
Loading
Foam Coarsening - Behaviour and Consequences in a Model Porous Medium
Conference Proceedings 2017, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201700364
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700364
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700364
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error