1887

Abstract

Summary

After a field discovery, E&P companies spend billions of dollars every year for subsurface appraisal. Most often, the appraisal decision is difficult and tortuous, lacks transparency and objectivity, and the level of appraisal is less than optimal which affect the full cycle project economics. This paper is an effort to manage uncertainty through appraisal by quantifying its impact on the field development plan and overall project profitability. An integrated approach of selecting appraisal well location and their sequencing using standard discounted cashflow analysis was adopted to calculate commercial value of a project in terms of an economic indicator considering different uncertain variables, their dependencies and correlation between them. To quantify the specific appraisal activity benefits, in terms of uncertainty reduction and its economic reward to the field development plan for an offshore clastic reservoir discovery, the Value of Information approach along with decision tree analysis was used and a comparison between different evaluated scenarios was made for an optimal appraisal selection. This method has helped prioritizing the appraisal locations including their sequencing, ensuring that appraisal plan adds value and allows management to understand the post discovery risks/opportunities for future investments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700481
2017-06-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bratvold, R.B., J.E.Bickel and H.P.Lohne
    , 2009. Value of information in the oil and gas industry: Past, present and future (110378-PA), SPE Reservoir Evaluat. Eng., 12: 630–638.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Demirmen, F.
    , 2001. Subsurface appraisal: The road from reservoir uncertainty to Better Economics (68603-MS), Proceedings of the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Apr. 2–3, Dallas, Texas, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Singh, V., I.Yemez and J.Sotomayor
    , 2013. Integrated 3D reservoir interpretation and modelling: Lessons learned and proposed solutions. Lead. Edge, 32: 1340–1353.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Yemez, I., H.Stigliano, V.Singh, and E.Izaguirre
    , 2016, Establishing minimum economic field size and analysing its role in exploration-project risks assessment: Evaluation of different methodologies, First Break, 34 No. 4, 29–38.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700481
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700481
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error