1887

Abstract

Summary

Migration Velocity Analysis is a technique to determine the background velocity model representing the macro structure of the subsurface. It is supposed to be a powerful tomographic imaging tool but in practice, only limited number of applications on real data have been reported. Recent studies proposed to replace migration, adjoint of Born modeling, by the asymptotic inverse in the context of extended subsurface offset domain. Following the same strategy, we develop a wave-equation based Inversion Velocity Analysis approach in the original surface-oriented shot domain. We derive the gradient of the modified Differential Semblance Optimization objective function. We discuss the advantages and limitations through applications on 2D synthetic data sets, first on a single reflector embedded in a homogeneous model and then on the Marmousi model. The main advantage of inversion over classical migration velocity analysis is an automatic compensation for geometrical spreading and illumination, leading to more stable velocity gradient, especially after Gaussian smoothing over a wavelength distance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700604
2017-06-12
2020-06-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chauris, H. and Cocher, E.
    [2017] From migration to inversion velocity analysis. accepted for publication to Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chauris, H., Lameloise, C. and Cocher, E.
    [2015] Inversion Velocity Analysis: the importance of regularisation. In: Expanded Abstracts. 77th Annual EAGE Meeting and Exposition, WS05-A02.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fei, W. and Williamson, P.
    [2010] On the gradient artifacts in migration velocity analysis based on differential semblance optimization. In: Expanded Abstracts. Soc. Expl. Geophys, 4071–4076.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hou, J. and Symes, W.W.
    [2015] An approximate inverse to the extended Born modeling operator. Geophysics, 80(6), R331–R349.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ten Kroode, F.
    [2012] A wave-equation-based Kirchhoff operator. Inverse Problems, 28(11), 115013.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lameloise, C.A., Chauris, H. and Noble, M.
    [2015] Improving the gradient of the image-domain objective function using quantitative migration for a more robust migration velocity analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 63(2), 391–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. van Leeuwen, T., Kumar, R. and Herrmann, F.
    [2015] Affordable Full Subsurface Image Volume -An Application to WEMVA. In: Expanded Abstracts. 77th Annual EAGE Meeting and Exposition, WS05-C01.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y. and Chauris, H.
    [2017] An alternative true-amplitude common-shot reverse time migration. In: submitted to Expanded Abstracts. 79th Annual EAGE Meeting and Exposition.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, Y., Symes, W.W. and Li, Z.
    [2014] Inversion velocity analysis via Differential Semblance Optimization. In: Expanded Abstracts. 76th Annual EAGE Meeting and Exposition, Th P02–07.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mulder, W.
    [2014] Subsurface offset behaviour in velocity analysis with extended reflectivity images. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(1), 17–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Plessix, R.E.
    [2006] A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophysical Journal International, 167(2), 495–503.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Qin, B., Allemand, T. and Lambaré, G
    . [2015] Full waveform inversion using preserved amplitude reverse time migration. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1252–1257.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sava, P. and Biondi, B.
    [2004] Wave-equation migration velocity analysis. I. Theory. Geophysical Prospecting, 52(6), 593–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shen, P. and Symes, W.W.
    [2015] Horizontal contraction in image domain for velocity inversion. Geophysics, 80(3), R95–R110.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Symes, W.W.
    [2008] Migration velocity analysis and waveform inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 56(6), 765–790.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700604
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700604
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error