1887

Abstract

Summary

Over the last decade, various international and national assessments of shale gas and shale oil resources for most EU-countries have been published. Due to methodological differences and in fundamental assumptions related to the quality and quantity of underlying geological information, these results are not comparable and in some cases not reproducible. This presentation focusses on the development and definition of a uniform methodology for estimating (in-place) shale gas and shale oil resources at the pan-European level within the context of the EUOGA study (EU Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment). The presented methodology is established to determine estimates of GIIP (Gas Initially In Place) and OIIP (Oil Initially In Place) including associated uncertainty bandwidths originating from the various geological input parameters. The method is applied to 81 onshore shale gas or oil formations from 33 thermogenic and two biogenic basins located within the participating European countries. The results of the assessment include a geological description of the basins together with a general chance of success, a ranking of the individual assessment units and the final calculation of GIIP or OIIP for the formations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700654
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, I.J.
    (2013) The Carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: geology and resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2014. The Jurassic shales of the Weald Basin: geology and shale oil and shale gas resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BGR
    (2016) Schieferöl und Schiefergas in Deutschland — Potenziale und Umweltaspekte. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover. https://www.bgr.bund.de/DE/Themen/Energie/Downloads/Abschlussbericht_13MB_Schieferoelgaspotenzial_Deutschland_2016.pdf?blob=publicationFile&v=5(last accessed 4 October 2016)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Charpentier, R.R., Cook, T.A.
    (2011) USGS methodology for assessing continuous petroleum resources. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1167, 73 p. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1167/.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. EIA
    (2013) Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington D.C., 730 p. http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/. Last Accessed 5 August 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Erlström, M., Elhammer, A., Snowbal, L.Z.
    (2014) Bedömning av olja och gas I berggrunden inom svenskt marint territorium och ekonomisk zon, främst Östersjön — en översikt. SGU-rapport 2014:26
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PGI
    (2012) Assessment of shale gas and shale oil resources of the Lower Paleozoic Baltic-Podlasie-Lublin basin in Poland. Resource document. Polish Geological Institute. http://www.pgi.gov.pl/en/mineral-resources-en/shale-gas/4744-shale-gasestimates.html. Last Accessed 5 August 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Bergen, F., Zijp, M., Nelskamp, S., Kombrink, H.
    (2013) Shale Gas Evaluation of the Early Jurassic Posidonia Shale Formation and the Carboniferous Epen Formation in the Netherlands. In: Chatellier, J., Jarvie, D. (eds) Critical assessment of shale resource plays. AAPG Memoir103, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700654
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700654
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error