Why Multiples Do Not Contribute to Deconvolution Imaging

References

1. Amundsen, L.
   [2001] Elimination of free-surface related multiples without need of the source wavelet. Geophysics, 66(1), 327–341.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anstey, N.A. and O’Doherty, R.F.
   [1971] Reflections on amplitudes. Geophysical Prospecting, 19, 430–458.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakulin, A. and Calvert, R.
   [2006] The virtual source method: Theory and case study. Geophysics, 71(4), SI139–SI150.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Behura, J., Wapenaar, K. and Snieder, R.
   [2014] Autofocus Imaging: Image reconstruction based on inverse scattering theory. Geophysics, 79(3), A19–A26.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berkhout, A.J.
   [1974] Related properties of minimum-phase and zero-phase time functions. Geophysical Prospecting, 22(4), 683–709.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davydenko, M. and Verschuur, D.J.
   [2017] Full-wavefield migration: using surface and internal multiples in imaging. Geophysical Prospecting, 65, 7–21.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Guo, B., Yu, J., Huang, Y., Hanafy, S.M. and Schuster, G.T.
   [2015] Benefits and limitations of imaging multiples: Interferometric and resonant migration. The Leading Edge, 34, 802–806.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Mehta, K., Bakulin, A., Sheiman, J., Calvert, R. and Snieder, R.
   [2007] Improving the virtual source method by wavefield separation. Geophysics, 72(4), V79–V86.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Minato, S. and Ghose, R.
   [2016] Enhanced characterization of fracture compliance heterogeneity using multiple reflections and data-driven Green’s function retrieval. Journal of Geophysical Research, 121, 2813–2836.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Robinson, E.A.
    [1954] Predictive decomposition of seismic traces with applications to seismic exploration. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Valenciano, A. and Chemingui, N.
    [2015] Introduction to this special section: Multiples from attenuation to imaging. The Leading Edge, 34, 742.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [2015] From removing to using multiples in closed-loop imaging. The Leading Edge, 34, 744–759.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Wapenaar, C.P.A. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [1986] Wave-field extrapolation techniques for inhomogeneous media which include critical angle events. Part III: Applications in modeling migration and inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 34(2), 180–207.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Wapenaar, K., Broggini, F., Slob, E. and Snieder, R.
    [2013] Three-dimensional single-sided Marchenko inverse scattering, data-driven focusing, Green’s function retrieval, and their mutual relations. Physical Review Letters, 110, 084301.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Wapenaar, K., Fokkema, J., Dillen, M. and Scherpenhuijsen, P.
    [2000] One-way acoustic reciprocity and its applications in multiple elimination and time-lapse seismics. In: SEG, Expanded Abstracts. 2377–2380.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Wapenaar, K., van der Neut, J. and Slob, E.
    [2017] On the role of multiples in Marchenko imaging. Geophysics, 82(1), A1–A5.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., van der Neut, J., Broggini, F., Slob, E. and Snieder, R.
    [2014] Marchenko imaging. Geophysics, 79(3), WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Weglein, A.B.
    [2015] Primaries - The only events that can be migrated and for which migration has a meaning. The Leading Edge, 34, 808–813.
    [Google Scholar]